2012
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/756/2/167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Size Scale of Star Clusters

Abstract: Direct N-body simulations of star clusters in a realistic Milky-Way-like potential are carried out using the code NBODY6. Based on these simulations, a new relationship between scale size and galactocentric distance is derived: the scale size of star clusters is proportional to the hyperbolic tangent of the galactocentric distance. The half-mass radius of star clusters increases systematically with galactocentric distance but levels off when star clusters orbit the galaxy beyond ∼40 kpc. These simulations show… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But in this case the radii of star clusters should eventually reflect their local tidal gravitational fields that usually decrease with increasing galactocentric radius. Our results suggest that clusters across the range of mass, age, and environment covered by our samples do not show effects of tidal truncations in their half-light radii; otherwise, a stronger increase of cluster size with galactocentric distance is expected (e.g., Madrid et al 2012;Webb et al 2016).…”
Section: 0mentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But in this case the radii of star clusters should eventually reflect their local tidal gravitational fields that usually decrease with increasing galactocentric radius. Our results suggest that clusters across the range of mass, age, and environment covered by our samples do not show effects of tidal truncations in their half-light radii; otherwise, a stronger increase of cluster size with galactocentric distance is expected (e.g., Madrid et al 2012;Webb et al 2016).…”
Section: 0mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Consistent with this expectation, we observe an overall increase in median radius as our clusters age from a few to 200Myr old, suggesting that many of the star clusters in our samples are still expanding to fill their tidal radii. Similarly, we also would expect to see a stronger correlation between effective radius and galactocentric distance if star clusters were significantly affected by the tidal field of their host galaxy (e.g., Madrid et al 2012;Puzia et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The slope in the mass–age plane is similar to that of the K200 model and distinct from that of the K100 model with R gc = 8.5 kpc. An investigation of the mass‐loss rates and dissolution times of star clusters as a function of orbit within the Galaxy will be the subject of an upcoming paper (Madrid, Hurley & Sippel ).…”
Section: General Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because star clusters lose more mass during pericentric passages on eccentric orbits, and therefore undergo stronger expansion due to some internal dynamical mechanism such as primordial mass segregation and dynamical relaxation which are dominant processes in the weaker tidal field at larger Galactocentric radii (Madrid, Hurley, & Sippel 2012;Haghi et al 2014) . It is therefore likely that an eccentric cluster orbit like the one we suggest has had an important influence on Pal 4's evolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%