“…Both the significant counterclockwise rotation (−27.2 ± 11.2°) and/tilting (−10.5° ± 4.5°) implied by the SGM stable secondary magnetization are thus not inconsistent with the tectonic history inferred from the Fuegian Andes. It should be acknowledged that the paleomagnetic data do not in themselves preclude a paleoposition of the SGM much farther to the east of Cape Horn, adjacent to Maurice Ewing Bank (Figure 1), as argued by different plate kinematic scenarios for the Scotia Sea (Eagles, 2010b(Eagles, , 2016Eagles & Eisermann, 2020); however, the correspondence of tectonostratiographic frameworks, termination of the Rocas Verdes basin at the Cape Horn escarpment and provenance of the Cretaceous sedimentary strata of the SGM, combined with the general similarities in the paleomagnetic signatures are strongly supportive of the traditional restored position of the SGM adjacent to the Fuegian Andes east of Cape Horn and south of Burdwood Bank (Dalziel & Elliot, 1971;Dalziel et al, 1975Dalziel et al, , 2021; Figure 8). The SGM, as part of the Fuegian Andes, apparently rotated ∼30° counterclockwise with variable local northward tilting in the Late Cretaceous before the SGM rifted off and somehow was transported over 1,700 km along the North Scotia Ridge to its current position in the Scotia Sea, possibly in an "orogenic stream" (Redfield et al, 2007) escaping eastward during closure of the Rocas Verdes marginal basin (Dalziel et al, 2021).…”