1982
DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(82)90094-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The slit catheter: a comparison with the wick catheter in the measurement of compartment pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,28,29 These findings highlight the importance of comparing methods such as these in a true clinical setting as presented here. Several authors [30][31][32][33] have suggested that a common potential source of error in vivo is insertion of the tip of the device into heterogeneous tissue (tendon, fascia, or other nonmuscle tissue), potentially leading to a false reading. We hypothesize that this was a likely cause of discrepancies between measurements in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,28,29 These findings highlight the importance of comparing methods such as these in a true clinical setting as presented here. Several authors [30][31][32][33] have suggested that a common potential source of error in vivo is insertion of the tip of the device into heterogeneous tissue (tendon, fascia, or other nonmuscle tissue), potentially leading to a false reading. We hypothesize that this was a likely cause of discrepancies between measurements in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, multiple compartment pressure estimations may be necessary to arrive at an accurate determination 19 . Techniques for the measurement of intracompartment pressure are described elsewhere 20,24 . Indirect methods include the use of tissue compliance measurement 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques for IMP monitoring include the needle manometer with or without infusion of saline into the compart-ment, [44][45][46] the wick catheter, 25,47 the slit catheter [48][49][50] (Fig. 1), or the solid state transducer intracompartmental catheter with or without a transducer at the tip.…”
Section: Which Methods Of Imp Monitoring?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,51,52 The advantages and disadvantages of each method are shown in Table 1. 25,33,40,44,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] All these methods are invasive and represent indirect measures of IMP.…”
Section: Which Methods Of Imp Monitoring?mentioning
confidence: 99%