2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ababa9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project: Mg ii Lag Results from Four Years of Monitoring

Abstract: We present reverberation mapping results for the Mg ii λ2800 Å broad emission line in a sample of 193 quasars at 0.35 < z < 1.7 with photometric and spectroscopic monitoring observations from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping project during 201… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
80
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
12
80
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative impact of microlensing is larger in C III] when compared with Mg II, indicating that the emission region associated with this line is more compact. We obtain size estimates of ∼31 and ∼67 light-days for the C III] and Mg II emission lines, in good agreement with RM studies (see, e.g., Clavel et al 1991;Homayouni et al 2020;Wang et al 2020). The high impact of microlensing in the C IV emission line indicates that this line arises from a region of ∼16 light-days in size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The relative impact of microlensing is larger in C III] when compared with Mg II, indicating that the emission region associated with this line is more compact. We obtain size estimates of ∼31 and ∼67 light-days for the C III] and Mg II emission lines, in good agreement with RM studies (see, e.g., Clavel et al 1991;Homayouni et al 2020;Wang et al 2020). The high impact of microlensing in the C IV emission line indicates that this line arises from a region of ∼16 light-days in size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The relative impact of microlensing is larger in C III] when compared with Mg II, indicating that the emission region associated with this line is more compact. We obtain size estimates of ∼31 and ∼67 light-days for the C III] and Mg II emission lines, in good agreement with RM studies (see, e.g., Clavel et al 1991;Homayouni et al 2020;Wang et al 2020). The high impact of microlensing in the C IV emission line indicates that this line arises from a region of ∼16 light-days in size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Of the three strong emission lines generally used to estimate central black hole masses, the R-L relationship is only well established for Hβ λ4861 (Bentz et al 2013 and references therein; but see the discussion in Section 3.3). Empirically establishing the R-L relationship for Mg II λ2798 (Clavel et al 1990(Clavel et al , 1991Reichert et al 1994;Metzroth et al 2006;Cackett et al 2015;Shen et al 2016;Lira et al 2018;Czerny et al 2019;Homayouni et al 2020;Zajaček et al 2020), as well as for C IV λ1549 (Clavel et al 1989(Clavel et al , 1990(Clavel et al , 1991Reichert et al 1994;Korista et al 1995;Rodríguez-Pascual et al 1997;Wanders et al 1997;O'Brien et al 1998;Peterson et al 2005;Metzroth et al 2006;Kaspi et al 2007;Trevese et al 2014;De Rosa et al 2015;Lira et al 2018;Grier et al 2019;Hoormann et al 2019),has been difficult because of the nature of the UV line variability and the high level of competition for suitable facilities.…”
Section: Reverberation-based Black Hole Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%