1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002619900336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The small renal mass: detection, characterization, and management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnosis in the present case was based on the presence of typical morphology and immunophenotype (S100 CT scanning, with and without the administration of contrast material, is necessary to take full advantage of the contrast enhancement characteristics of highly vascular renal parenchymal tumours. In general, any renal mass that enhances with intravenous administration of contrast material on CT scanning by more than 15 HU should be considered an RCC until proven otherwise (7). In this patient, a contrast-enhanced CT revealed a heterogeneously enhanced mass (more than 20 HU; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis in the present case was based on the presence of typical morphology and immunophenotype (S100 CT scanning, with and without the administration of contrast material, is necessary to take full advantage of the contrast enhancement characteristics of highly vascular renal parenchymal tumours. In general, any renal mass that enhances with intravenous administration of contrast material on CT scanning by more than 15 HU should be considered an RCC until proven otherwise (7). In this patient, a contrast-enhanced CT revealed a heterogeneously enhanced mass (more than 20 HU; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the recommendation for indeterminate small renal masses is follow-up imaging studies [4] because it is thought that most of these lesions are cysts, and that even if the lesions are malignant, there is little risk of advancement of tumor stage [24]. However, it is also known that small renal malignancies can metastasize if left untreated [25], and earlier treatment may improve prognosis [26], since the tumor stage at the start of treatment is the most important prognostic factor for primary renal malignancy [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the discovery of an incidental renal mass of >5 cm, if not clearly characterized as malignant by radiological features, might also require biopsy. However, it could be argued that for lesions of <1 cm in diameter the overwhelming majority are simple cysts, unless the patient is predisposed to developing RCC [31] . However, for observation of renal tumours, a safe threshold size of <3 cm has been suggested, below which the metastatic potential of observed lesions is low [32] .…”
Section: Arguments In Favour Of Biopsy For Incidental Renal Tumoursmentioning
confidence: 99%