1966
DOI: 10.21236/ad0487353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Small Scale Gap Test: Calibration and Comparison With the Large Scale Gap Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently we have observed these same trends for pressed RDX Grade A/polyethylene wax at lower wax levels [181 and also for pressed RDX Grade A/polyurethane/zinc stearate formulations (191. These results are clearly in conflict with the consistent trends observed from other gap tests, particularly the NOL SSGT [2,91. The aim of the study described here was to identify the cause of this discrepancy.…”
Section: 3contrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently we have observed these same trends for pressed RDX Grade A/polyethylene wax at lower wax levels [181 and also for pressed RDX Grade A/polyurethane/zinc stearate formulations (191. These results are clearly in conflict with the consistent trends observed from other gap tests, particularly the NOL SSGT [2,91. The aim of the study described here was to identify the cause of this discrepancy.…”
Section: 3contrasting
confidence: 85%
“…The most widely used gap tests are those developed at Naval Ordnance Laboratories (now Naval Surface Warfare Center); the small scale gap test (NOL SSGT) [ [2,3,5,9,101. At MRL we use a SSGT similar to the AWRE SSGT [61.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ease with which a detectable reaction of any kind can be initiated in an explosive; the tendency of a small reaction, once established, to grow to destructive proportions; and the ease with which a high-order detonation can be established in an explosive all contribute to the materials response to the stimulus in a sensitivity test. These properties are a consequence of the kinetics and thermodynamics of the thermal decomposition of the explosive.Weston et al [1] have considered relationships among various shock sensitivity tests and Price [2][3][4] has considered a variety of factors important in shock sensitivity tests. Among the more sensitive explosives, correlations tend to be satisfactory between tests that rely on shock initiation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spacer thickness is varied from shot to shot until the 50% point of causing detonation, as determined from the results in a steel witness plate at the end of the cylinder. The geometries of the various tests are listed in Table 2 [7,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The flyer method is at the top, and the gap tests are listed in descending order of how much they usually deviate from the flyer results.…”
Section: Gap Test Datamentioning
confidence: 99%