The SmokefreeTXT (SFTXT) Study: Web and Mobile Data Collection to Evaluate Smoking Cessation for Young Adults

Abstract

BackgroundText messaging (short message service, SMS) has been shown to be effective in delivering interventions for various diseases and health conditions, including smoking cessation. While there are many published studies regarding smoking cessation text messaging interventions, most do not provide details about the study’s operational methods. As a result, there is a gap in our understanding of how best to design studies of smoking cessation text messaging programs.ObjectiveThe purpose of this paper is to detail the operational methods used to conduct a randomized trial comparing three different versions of the National Cancer Institute’s SmokefreeText (SFTXT) program, designed for smokers 18 to 29 years of age. We detail our methods for recruiting participants from the Internet, reducing fraud, conducting online data collection, and retaining panel study participants.MethodsParticipants were recruited through website advertisements and market research online panels. Screening questions established eligibility for the study (eg, 18 to 29 years of age, current smoker). Antifraud measures screened out participants who could not meet the study requirements. After completing a baseline survey, participants were randomized to one of three study arms, which varied by type and timing of text message delivery. The study offered US $20 gift cards as incentives to complete each of four follow-up surveys. Automated email reminders were sent at designated intervals to increase response rates. Researchers also provided telephone reminders to those who had not completed the survey after multiple email reminders. We calculated participation rates across study arms and compared the final sample characteristics to the Current Population Survey to examine generalizability.ResultsRecruitment methods drove 153,936 unique visitors to the SFTXT Study landing page and 27,360 began the screener. Based on the screening questions, 15,462 out of 27,360 responders (56.51%) were eligible to participate. Of the 15,462 who were eligible, 9486 passed the antifraud measures that were implemented; however, 3882 failed to verify their email addresses or cell phone numbers, leaving 5604 who were invited to complete the baseline survey. Of the 5604 who were invited, 4432 completed the baseline survey, but only 4027 were retained for analysis because 405 did not receive the intervention.ConclusionsAlthough antifraud measures helped to catch participants who failed study requirements and could have biased the data collected, it is possible that the email and cell phone verification check excluded some potentially eligible participants from the study. Future research should explore ways to implement verification methods without risking the loss of so many potential participants.ClinicalTrialClinical Trials.gov NCT01885052; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01885052; (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6iWzcmFdw)

Participant Recruitment and Retention in Remote eHealth Intervention Trials: Methods and Lessons Learned From a Large Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Web-Based Smoking Interventions

“…Most participants in this trial were women. Although some studies have successfully recruited samples comprised entirely of males for eHealth research through targeted advertisement campaigns [ 27 , 49 , 54 ], it is quite common among eHealth intervention trials to have a greater proportion of women compared to men [ 3 , 9 , 24 , 25 , 30 , 55 - 58 ]. This is not surprising as women are more likely to utilize eHealth programs [ 59 ].…”

Cold Turkey and Hot Vapes? A National Study of Young Adult Cigarette Cessation Strategies

“…As an alternative to digital promotion of tobacco products, digital and mobile health interventions, including text messaging, apps, social media, and online interventions, may be effective tools to improve the relevance and reach of evidencebased cessation for young adult smokers. [33][34][35] Moreover, there is emerging evidence that digital interventions can support smoking cessation among young adults, 35,36 though studies have also found that young adults engaged less with an online smoking cessation intervention compared with older smokers. 37 Given the promise of digital interventions to increase reach to young adult smokers, future research should investigate effective strategies for improving engagement among young adults and for helping them achieve abstinence through digital smoking cessation interventions.…”

Cancer health self‐efficacy improvement in a randomized controlled trial

“…16 In this study, we found approximately half of participants never logged into the web intervention and overall usage was relatively low, challenges similar to other eHealth studies. [21][22][23]25,26 Those in the intervention group were further away from active treatment than controls (2.6 vs 1.9 years out). Furthermore, 34% only engaged in the text intervention.…”