2020
DOI: 10.3934/cpaa.2020045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Soap Bubble Theorem and a $ p $-Laplacian overdetermined problem

Abstract: We consider the p-Laplacian equation −∆pu = 1 for 1 < p < 2, on a regular bounded domain Ω ⊂ R N , with N ≥ 2, under homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions. In the spirit of Alexandrov's Soap Bubble Theorem and of Serrin's symmetry result for the overdetermined problems, we prove that if the mean curvature H of ∂Ω is constant, then Ω is a ball and the unique solution of the Dirichlet p-Laplacian problem is radial. The main tools used are integral identities, the P -function, and the maximum principle.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which proves the thesis also in this case. Having in mind that, for p = 2, the fractional Laplacian of u s,2 (x) = (1 − |x| 2 ) s + is constant in (−1, 1), see for instance Section 3, and that −∆ p (1 − |x| p p−1 ) is constant in (−1, 1), see for instance [6], it is tempting to conjecture that also (−∆ p ) s u s,p is constant in (−1, 1). In the next section we verify numerically that this conjecture is false.…”
Section: The Fractional Torsion Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…which proves the thesis also in this case. Having in mind that, for p = 2, the fractional Laplacian of u s,2 (x) = (1 − |x| 2 ) s + is constant in (−1, 1), see for instance Section 3, and that −∆ p (1 − |x| p p−1 ) is constant in (−1, 1), see for instance [6], it is tempting to conjecture that also (−∆ p ) s u s,p is constant in (−1, 1). In the next section we verify numerically that this conjecture is false.…”
Section: The Fractional Torsion Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in the local case s = 1, it is easy to prove that the function (1 − |x| m ), with m = p p−1 , has constant p-Laplacian in (−1, 1), see for instance [6]. Moreover, in the linear case p = 2, it has been proved that (1 − x 2 ) s + satisfies (−∆) s (1 − x 2 ) s + = Const.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%