The social acceptance of artificial photosynthesis: towards a conceptual framework

Abstract

Advancements in artificial photosynthesis have the potential to radically transform how societies convert and use energy. Their successful development, however, hinges not only on technical breakthroughs, but also acceptance and adoption by energy users. This article introduces a conceptual framework enabling analysts, planners and even investors to determine environments where artificial photosynthesis may thrive, and those where it may struggle. Drawn from work looking at the barriers and acceptance of solar photovoltaic and wind energy systems, the article proposes that social acceptance has multiple dimensions—socio-political, community and market—that must be met holistically in order for investors and users to embrace new technologies. The article argues that any future market acceptance for artificial photosynthesis will depend upon the prevalence of nine factors, which create conducive environments; the lack of the conditions engenders environments where they will likely be rejected. The conditions are (i) strong institutional capacity; (ii) political commitment; (iii) favourable legal and regulatory frameworks; (iv) competitive installation and/or production costs; (v) mechanisms for information and feedback; (vi) access to financing; (vii) prolific community and/or individual ownership and use; (viii) participatory project siting; and (ix) recognition of externalities or positive public image.

Exploring the Generation Z Attitude towards Energy Efficiency Improvement and Decarbonization through Heat Pumps: An Empirical Study in Romania

“…It should be emphasized that one form of acceptance is not enough individually. Therefore, it is required that all are evaluated in order to increase the efficiency of an implementation program for heat pump systems in buildings [32]. Thus, the heat pump systems have to be accepted not only in a passive way (stakeholders not opposing) but also in an active way (stakeholders investing and adopting).…”

Semi-Synthetic Responsive Matrices for Artificial Photosynthesis

“…Such research is relevant for developers of a technology such as artificial photosynthesis, as it promotes a consideration of technologies for renewable energy that is not agnostic to their broader societal implications but attentive to the fact that technologies are integrated into and interacting with socio-cultural systems. 52,53 For the discipline of the humanities, this research is relevant, as it advocates a dynamic role for the humanities as a force that can contribute to the shaping of a technology at an early stage. It seeks empowerment for the humanities to become a responsible shareholder in the societal debate about renewable energy resources and to critically support the implementation of technological innovation in a dynamic exchange between the humanities and science.…”

Does the world need a global project on artificial photosynthesis?

“…Sovacool & Gross [12] draw upon research into market and community barriers to and acceptance of solar photovoltaic and wind energy systems to propose nine factors likely to be critical to global uptake of AP technology. These factors are (i) strong institutional capacity, (ii) political commitment, (iii) favourable legal and regulatory frameworks, (iv) competitive installation financing, (v) mechanisms for information and feedback, (vi) access to financing, (vii) prolific community and/or individual ownership and use, (viii) participatory project siting, and (ix) recognition of externalities or positive public image.…”