2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0193-3973(02)00111-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The social and behavioral ecology of mixed-age and same-age preschool classrooms: A natural experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Relevant to the current inquiry, Moller et al (2008) found that compared to children enrolled in a same-age class, those enrolled in a mixed-age class made fewer gains in motor skills as reported by their teachers. This negative association was most pronounced for older children, which was similar to findings by Winsler et al (2002) in relation to social behaviors among 4-and 3-year-olds in mixed-age settings. Thus, more research is needed, especially for directly assessed visuomotor integration as an outcome.…”
Section: Age Rangesupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relevant to the current inquiry, Moller et al (2008) found that compared to children enrolled in a same-age class, those enrolled in a mixed-age class made fewer gains in motor skills as reported by their teachers. This negative association was most pronounced for older children, which was similar to findings by Winsler et al (2002) in relation to social behaviors among 4-and 3-year-olds in mixed-age settings. Thus, more research is needed, especially for directly assessed visuomotor integration as an outcome.…”
Section: Age Rangesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Or, older children may adopt less sophisticated approaches to play and learning to accommodate younger children and may be less likely to challenge their visuomotor skills. This possibility is supported by research showing that the behavior of 4-year-olds in mixed-age classrooms resembles the behavior of 3-year-olds in same-age classrooms (Winsler et al, 2002).…”
Section: Few Contextual Contributors To Longitudinal Improvement In Vmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Child age was included in the analysis as a control variable, given that preschool classrooms in the United States may serve children as young as 3 years to as old as 5 or 6 years (e.g., Winsler et al, 2002). The following three specific research aims guided our investigation:…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, “pre-k” does not have a standardized meaning with respect to children’s’ ECE experience because each state creates their pre-k programs independently, and, thus, the characteristics of these program vary widely across states (Gilliam & Ripple, 2004; Jenkins, 2014; Lombardi, 2003; Pianta & Howes, 2009). Some pre-k programs—such as Oklahoma’s—are recognized as very high quality and offer features such as frequent instructional interactions in subject-matter learning, teachers who are emotionally supportive of children and who are credentialed, and classroom environments that are well-organized, efficient with time management, and include developmentally appropriate learning materials (Burchinal, 1999; Mashburn et al, 2008; Phillips, Gormley, & Lowenstein, 2009; Pianta et al, 2005; Wong, Cook, Barnett, & Jung, 2008). For these reasons, the effects of any particular pre-k program cannot be generalized to state pre-k programs nationwide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oklahoma and Boston’s pre-k evaluations also use regression discontinuity designs based on a strict age eligibility cutoff and found large short-term improvements in early reading, writing, math skills, and executive function (ES range= .99-.36) (Gormley, 2008; Gormley & Gayer, 2005; Gormley et al, 2005; Weiland & Yoshikawa, 2013). Using a similar regression discontinuity design, studies of pre-k programs in Arkansas (Hustedt, Barnett, & Jung, 2008) and a five-state pre-k comparison found positive effects for early reading, literacy, and math skills (ES range= .23-.96) (Wong et al, 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%