2012
DOI: 10.1177/1476127012461576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The social and economic bases of network multiplexity: Exploring the emergence of multiplex ties

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link Forthcoming in Strategic Organization 1The social and economic bases of network multiplexity: Exploring the emergence of multiplex ties AbstractThe goal of this paper is to shed light on the role of tie content in the evolution of multiplex ties -i.e., ties featuring both an economic and a social component -in interorganizational networks. We clarify and extend the t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
2
71
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This simplification is not always appropriate because analyzing only a single network where multiple networks interact can potentially distort results (Ellwardt et al, 2012;Ferriani et al, 2013;Huitsing et al, 2012;Leicht & D'Souza, 2009;. The problem is that reliable longitudinal multivariate data are lacking, and appropriate analytical methods that would enable formal theorizing through quantitative testing of hypotheses are under development (Entwisle et al, 2007;Kadushin, 2012).…”
Section: Multiplexity Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This simplification is not always appropriate because analyzing only a single network where multiple networks interact can potentially distort results (Ellwardt et al, 2012;Ferriani et al, 2013;Huitsing et al, 2012;Leicht & D'Souza, 2009;. The problem is that reliable longitudinal multivariate data are lacking, and appropriate analytical methods that would enable formal theorizing through quantitative testing of hypotheses are under development (Entwisle et al, 2007;Kadushin, 2012).…”
Section: Multiplexity Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have focused on the effect of relationships on value capture because the extant literature demonstrated that: 1) relationships contribute to generation of economic value (Granovetter, 1973;Ferriani, Fonti, & Corrado, 2013;Uzzi, 1996Uzzi, , 1997Uzzi, , 1999Gulati, 1995;Fernandez et al, 2000;Castilla, 2005;Petersen et al, 2000); and 2) division of value between participants in transactions may be uneven and some parties may capture more (Fernandez-Mateo, 2007;Bidwell & Fernandez-Mateo, 2010). We built on this literature and developed hypotheses that suggest that value capture by one party will be greater when that party learns more in the previous relationships and when those relationships lead to development of trust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These relationships may be characterized by common "contacts [or] spot market transactions" (Aldrich, 1999, p. 235). The social dimension enables faster transactions or transactions at non-market rates, and are analogous to socially embedded relationships (Uzzi, 1999;Ferriani et al, 2013). The interactions within the relationship are accelerated because the social or affective component of the relationship enables faster fine-grained information transfer, increases trust in fulfilling the exchange, and accelerates agreement on the terms and conditions of the exchange.…”
Section: Social Multiplexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategic changes tend to occur at higher levels of multiplexity. At the social and relational level, there is a growing body of evidence of how multiplexity evolves (e.g., Hite, 2003Hite, , 2005Jack et al, 2008;Jack et al, 2010;Ferriani et al, 2013). However, beyond the relational level, evidence of changes in strategic or closed multiplexity remains sparse or anecdotal.…”
Section: Implications For Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation