2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-015-1939-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The social and physical vulnerability assessment of old texture against earthquake (case study: Fahadan district in Yazd City)

Abstract: The disasters can result in considerable damages to urban structures. In vulnerable cities, the amount of economic damages and fatalities is highlighted. The review of the literature indicates the urban vulnerabilities related to building qualification and the society situation. In this paper, some factors that can affect the vulnerability of old cities in Iran are listed. For evaluating the importance of each factor in identifying the vulnerability of Fahadan district, the AHP method is used. Twenty-five acad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is in line with this that some studies itemize social and physical conditions of communities as two major attributes of disaster vulnerabilities such that their identification and assessment provide better alternatives to reducing risks to disaster. Living attributes of people, social networks, beliefs, customs, and other population characteristics depict social conditions [37], whilst conditions of infrastructures, physical accessibility, and densities highlight the physical aspect [38]. Consequently, approaches to analyzing these conditions have also toed similar paths by categorizing their indicators into social and built environments [39,40].…”
Section: Disasters and Vulnerabilities Of Foreign Residents In Japanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is in line with this that some studies itemize social and physical conditions of communities as two major attributes of disaster vulnerabilities such that their identification and assessment provide better alternatives to reducing risks to disaster. Living attributes of people, social networks, beliefs, customs, and other population characteristics depict social conditions [37], whilst conditions of infrastructures, physical accessibility, and densities highlight the physical aspect [38]. Consequently, approaches to analyzing these conditions have also toed similar paths by categorizing their indicators into social and built environments [39,40].…”
Section: Disasters and Vulnerabilities Of Foreign Residents In Japanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, a total of nine conditional factors or parameters with 37 classes from two main indicators were considered. Examples of physical indicators are street pattern, building density, building alignment, open space density, land cover and other built-environment related factors [35,36] and examples of environmental factors include slope, geological features, aspect, fault and other natural-related features [24]. According to [37], in GIS-based studies, the selected factors should be operational, complete, non-uniform, measurable, and non-redundant.…”
Section: Conditional Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate seismic vulnerability, many studies have applied the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in conjunction with a geographic information system (GIS). If multiple targets require evaluation, they are stratified and their importance is quantified to determine the relative priorities of their criteria by using factor weighting [3,14,[34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%