From Evidence to Action 2016
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198769446.003.0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Social Cash Transfer Programme of Malawi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transfers for the SCTP in 27 of its 28 districts are funded by a group of donors while the Government of Malawi (GoM) funds the transfers in one district (UNICEF, 2021)—though funding there is erratic, and transfers are not made reliably as to the programme's schedule. The SCTP started as a pilot in 2006 with the aim of alleviating ‘poverty, hunger, and starvation in the targeted households, as well as improving health, nutrition, and education conditions of the children living in those households’ (Angeles et al, 2016) and was strongly influenced by Zambia's SCT which involved the same key stakeholders and consultants (Pruce & Hickey, 2020). The aim was to reach households that were both ultra‐poor and labour constrained (such as elderly caring for children), approximately 10% of the population (Schubert, 2009)—though attempting to define households in the context of Malawi's (and Lesotho's) SCTs is problematic (Ansell et al, 2019).…”
Section: Data and Studied Cash Transfersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transfers for the SCTP in 27 of its 28 districts are funded by a group of donors while the Government of Malawi (GoM) funds the transfers in one district (UNICEF, 2021)—though funding there is erratic, and transfers are not made reliably as to the programme's schedule. The SCTP started as a pilot in 2006 with the aim of alleviating ‘poverty, hunger, and starvation in the targeted households, as well as improving health, nutrition, and education conditions of the children living in those households’ (Angeles et al, 2016) and was strongly influenced by Zambia's SCT which involved the same key stakeholders and consultants (Pruce & Hickey, 2020). The aim was to reach households that were both ultra‐poor and labour constrained (such as elderly caring for children), approximately 10% of the population (Schubert, 2009)—though attempting to define households in the context of Malawi's (and Lesotho's) SCTs is problematic (Ansell et al, 2019).…”
Section: Data and Studied Cash Transfersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SCTP was then expanded from a pilot in seven districts, to a national programme in 18 of the country's 28 districts. The coverage of beneficiaries increased from 25,000 households in 2012 to 68,550 at the end of 2014 (Angeles et al, 2016). The primary funders were the German government through the German Development Bank (KfW), the European Union, Irish Aid, and the World Bank.…”
Section: The Expansion Of Social Cash Transfers Under President Joyce...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Civil servants in the Economic Planning Department of the Ministry of Finance drafted a social support policy that was presented to the Cabinet in 2008. The draft policy—together with results of impact evaluations—was not debated in the Cabinet because social protection was not high on the agenda (Angeles et al, 2016). For the next four years, the Cabinet did not act on the draft policy or evaluation results because social protection did not align with Mutharika's ideas, nor did it address the DPP's political interests.…”
Section: The Development Of Social Protection In Malawi: 2006–2012mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to this context and the need for innovative economic development and health promotion strategies, in 2006, the government of Malawi launched the Social Cash Transfer Program (SCTP; Angeles et al, 2016). The SCTP is an unconditional cash transfer program that targets ultra-poor and labor-constrained households and provides small amounts of cash every 2 months.…”
Section: Malawi’s Social Cash Transfer Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the cash is unconditional, meaning that beneficiaries are not required to use the money in a specific way, nor is provision of the cash contingent on any specific behaviors, the main goals of the program are poverty alleviation, improved food security, and increased school enrolment. Since its inception, research and evaluation have been critical to informing iterative design of the policies and implementation processes of the SCTP (Angeles et al, 2016). In the most recent impact evaluation of the Malawi SCTP conducted in 2015, compared with nonbeneficiary households, beneficiary households had significant improvements in food security, consumption, and school enrolment and retention with more mixed and less compelling findings in the areas of health and nutrition outcomes (Abdoulayi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Malawi’s Social Cash Transfer Programmentioning
confidence: 99%