2021
DOI: 10.1002/casp.2522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The social cohesion investment: Communities that invested in integration programmes are showing greater social cohesion in the midst of the COVID‐19 pandemic

Abstract: Social cohesion can rise in the aftermath of natural disasters or mass tragedies, but this 'coming together' is often shortlived. The early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic witnessed marked increases in kindness and social connection, but as months passed social tensions re-emerged or

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The ndings are consistent with testimonies that the COVID-19 pandemic has brought communities closer together, because it has made them more aware about the consequences and connected them to each other (e.g., Holzwarth, 2020). The ndings are also consistent with the proposition that investing in national, inclusive social cohesion contributes to the formation of stronger, more connected, and more open communities that are better prepared to cope with crisis situations (Lalot et al, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The ndings are consistent with testimonies that the COVID-19 pandemic has brought communities closer together, because it has made them more aware about the consequences and connected them to each other (e.g., Holzwarth, 2020). The ndings are also consistent with the proposition that investing in national, inclusive social cohesion contributes to the formation of stronger, more connected, and more open communities that are better prepared to cope with crisis situations (Lalot et al, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Stigma contributes to disengagement from health‐protective behaviours and can directly contribute to perverse, negative health‐effects (Hatzenbuehler, Phelan, & Link, 2013 ). On the other hand, greater social cohesion has been found to generate more trust in Covid‐19 government measures, which leads to greater adherence to health measures and therefore increased engagement with risk mitigation (Lalot, Abrams, Broadwood, Hayon, & Platts‐Dunn, 2021 ). Stigma is likely to be mitigated by adequate co‐production and pilot testing with affected communities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broadwood, Hayon, & Platts-Dunn, 2021). Stigma is likely to be mitigated by adequate coproduction and pilot testing with affected communities.…”
Section: Continuedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to planning for future crises, it is promising that evidence suggests it is possible to build a reservoir of social cohesion before emergencies occur, and that this can help buffer their negative impact. For instance, in the UK, constituents of local authorities who invested in community-building programs in the years prior to the pandemic showed greater social cohesion, well-being, and optimism during the pandemic than constituents of authorities who failed to make such investments (Lalot et al, 2021). In particular, special efforts may be required among those who feel disenfranchised, left behind, or simply "not in this together".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%