The Social Consequences of Disasters: Individual and Community Change

Abstract

We review findings from the last decade of research on the effects of disasters, concentrating on three important themes: the differences between the recovery of places versus people, the need to differentiate between short- and long-term recovery trajectories, and the changing role of government and how it has exacerbated inequality in recovery and engendered feedback loops that create greater vulnerability. We reflect the focus of the majority of sociological studies on disasters by concentrating our review on studies in the United States, but we also include studies on disasters throughout the world if they contribute to our empirical and theoretical understanding of disasters and their impacts. We end with a discussion of the inevitability of more severe disasters as climate change progresses and call on social scientists to develop new concepts and to use new methods to study these developments. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Sociology, Volume 46 is July 30, 2020. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Disparities in Disruptions to Postsecondary Education Plans During the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Disparities in disaster-induced consequences could expose social and structural inequalities that may otherwise stay undiscovered; therefore, scholars have been using various types of disasters as strategic research sites to examine social processes and inequalities (Arcaya et al, 2020). In particular, social vulnerability, or the susceptibility to loss from a disaster (Blaikie et al, 2014), is at the focus of social science research.…”

When rebuilding no longer means recovery: the stress of staying put after Hurricane Sandy

“…There are few direct comparisons between individuals who receive support to relocate and those who do not and scarce research into the experiences of such individuals and their communities over time (for important exceptions, see Binder et al 2019 ; Barile et al 2020 ). These gaps are crucial to address given disaster recovery’s nonlinear nature, and as climate change alters baseline conditions, making extreme events less exceptional and subjecting growing numbers to recurring trauma and dislocation (Arcaya et al 2020 ; Klinenberg et al 2020 ).…”

How did Wuhan residents cope with a 76-day lockdown?

“…Our theoretical approach is informed by the scholarship on natural disasters and disease outbreaks that seeks to "de-naturalize" these events and experiences (see Arcaya, Raker, andWaters 2020 andTierney 2007 for reviews). This body of scholarship emphasizes how disasters are socially produced (i.e.…”

“…This body of scholarship emphasizes how disasters are socially produced (i.e. shaped by social, political, and economic contexts) and how responses are likewise embedded in local settings structured by institutional, political, and social factors (Arcaya, Raker, and Waters 2020;Tierney 2007). A classic sociological study of disaster, Heat Wave, detailed how unequal exposure to the risk of dying from Chicago's extreme heat in 1995 was produced through specific neighbourhood conditions, welfare state retrenchments, and long-standing racial-ethnic and class inequalities (Klinenberg 2002).…”