2014
DOI: 10.1163/15685373-12342112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Social Cost of Atheism: How Perceived Religiosity Influences Moral Appraisal

Abstract: Social psychologists have found that stereotypes correlate with moraljudgments about agents and actions. The most commonly studied stereotypes are race/ethnicity and gender. But atheists compose another stereotype, one with its own ignominious history in the Western world, and yet, one about which very little is known. This project endeavored to further our understanding of atheism as a social stereotype. Specifically, we tested whether people with non-religious commitments were stereotypically viewed as less … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Christians have been shown to hold wildly inaccurate perceptions of the moral values of atheists (Simpson and Rios 2016a), and atheists are often perceived as less moral than religious believers (Hout and Fischer 2002), especially among those who are highly religious (Galen et al 2011). Consequently, immoral behavior is perceived as being consistent with atheism (Wright and Nichols 2014), which may be especially important in the political realm where various moral concerns have been shown to predict voting behavior (Franks and Scherr 2015).…”
Section: Factors Underlying Anti-atheist Prejudicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Christians have been shown to hold wildly inaccurate perceptions of the moral values of atheists (Simpson and Rios 2016a), and atheists are often perceived as less moral than religious believers (Hout and Fischer 2002), especially among those who are highly religious (Galen et al 2011). Consequently, immoral behavior is perceived as being consistent with atheism (Wright and Nichols 2014), which may be especially important in the political realm where various moral concerns have been shown to predict voting behavior (Franks and Scherr 2015).…”
Section: Factors Underlying Anti-atheist Prejudicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have found that atheists are among the least favorably viewed groups in the United States (Edgell, Gerteis, & Hartmann, 2006; Jones, 2012), often experiencing discrimination (Hammer, Cragun, Hwang, & Smith, 2012). In addition, atheists are perceived as untrustworthy (Franks & Scherr, 2014; Gervais, Shariff, & Norenzayan, 2011), immoral (Cook, Cottrell, & Webster, 2015; Wright & Nichols, 2014), and angry (Meier, Fetterman, Robinson, & Lappas, 2015). Further, atheists are generally underrepresented in the scientific literature and in psychology scholarship in particular (Brewster, Robinson, Sandil, Esposito, & Geiger, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note a curious effect that views tended to become less favorable toward atheists/agnostics by about 5% on average. We find this a notable and intriguing pattern in that an intensive study abroad/away experience with a strong focus on faith, spirituality, and religion tended to produce more antagonistic feelings toward those whom students may perceive to be irreligious and hostile toward religion, based on popular stereotypes (Wright & Nichols, 2014). One of the respondents shared why this might have been the case for them:…”
Section: Favorability Toward Religious Out-groupsmentioning
confidence: 83%