2021
DOI: 10.1097/ncm.0000000000000497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Social Determinants of Mental Health

Abstract: he health care industry remains fixated on the social determinants of health (SDoH), the nonclinical psychosocial and socioeconomic circumstances that contribute to health outcomes. The five long-standing SDoH domains were updated for Healthy People 2030 (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2020a) at the end of 2020 and continue to top the priority list for every organization:1. Economic stability 2. Education access and quality 3. Health care access and quality 4. Neighborhood and built environment 5.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In parallel at the social level, stigma, which compromises service quality worldwide, has been categorised as one of the most notable factors that prevent accessing mental health services in Colombia [23]. According to Campo-Arias, Oviedo and Herazo (2014) [24,25] the most common sources of stigma are the surrounding community, family, employees and colleagues, and media.…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel at the social level, stigma, which compromises service quality worldwide, has been categorised as one of the most notable factors that prevent accessing mental health services in Colombia [23]. According to Campo-Arias, Oviedo and Herazo (2014) [24,25] the most common sources of stigma are the surrounding community, family, employees and colleagues, and media.…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theme of mental illness stigma between racial minorities and majorities was extensively researched by Eylem et al (2020); the authors completed a systematic review and meta-analysis that summarized the evidence of 29 studies with 193,418 participants ( N = 35,836 in racial minorities). The impact of the assorted types of stigma on racial and ethnic groups, as discussed in the Part 1 article (e.g., experienced, anticipated, perceived), impacted how readily these populations accessed mental health care (Eylem et al, 2020; Fink-Samnick, 2021) The conclusions were emphatic: Mental health stigma is far higher among minority groups, with “anti-stigma” strategies a must to enhance successful linkage and engagement in outreach treatment (Eylem et al, 2020).…”
Section: Treatment Inequities and Mental Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unconscious, implicit, and explicit bias impacts patient engagement, treatment, and ultimately outcomes, as discussed in Part 1 (Fink-Samnick, 2021). Yet, a rapidly emerging body of research is focused on the disparity of treatment outcomes from culturally or racially discordant versus concordant care: having a shared identity between patient and practitioner versus differing (racial, ethnic, cultural) identities.…”
Section: Treatment Inequities and Mental Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations