2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The social evolution of individual differences: Future directions for a comparative science of personality in social behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 358 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The social niche specialization hypothesis suggests that personality traits should be more prominent in more social species because the diversity of consistent behavioural types reduces social competition within groups and, thus, should be favoured [ 42 ]. However, this theoretical prediction, so far, has been tested in only a few comparative studies of closely related but socially different species [ 44 ]. The only two available studies for mammals produced equivocal results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The social niche specialization hypothesis suggests that personality traits should be more prominent in more social species because the diversity of consistent behavioural types reduces social competition within groups and, thus, should be favoured [ 42 ]. However, this theoretical prediction, so far, has been tested in only a few comparative studies of closely related but socially different species [ 44 ]. The only two available studies for mammals produced equivocal results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“The social niche specialization” hypothesis [ 42 ] predicts that the consistency of personality traits should vary with the species’ sociality, with more social species exhibiting greater between-individual differences. Nevertheless, thus far, only a few studies have compared personality consistency between closely related but socially different species [ 27 , 43 , 44 ]. Thus, species specificity should be considered when interpreting the results of personality tests [ 8 ], and the interspecies comparisons under standardized test procedures are in high demand as they can provide new insights into ecological and evolutionary drivers of variation in behavioural traits within and between species [ 12 , 27 , 40 , 43 , 45 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"The social niche specialization" hypothesis [42] predicts that the consistency of personality traits should vary with the species' sociality, with more social species exhibiting greater betweenindividual differences. Nevertheless, thus far, only a few studies have compared personality consistency between closely related but socially different species [27,43,44]. Thus, species specificity should be considered when interpreting the results of personality tests [8], and the interspecies comparisons under standardized test procedures are in high demand as they can provide new insights into ecological and evolutionary drivers of variation in behavioural traits within and between species [12,27,40,43,45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Martin et al (2022), there may be mechanisms of adaptive social plasticity in personality that reflect the changing costs and benefits of social behavior in different contexts. Because social niche specializations involve various social roles and tactics that individuals use to deal with social challenges, the evolution of these roles is likely driven by processes at both the individual and group levels that optimize social interactions with partners.…”
Section: Variation and Selection Of Personality Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also enhance synergies and marginal benefits between group members who specialize, which promotes emergence and maintenance of individual differences in behavior. This creates a feedback loop that establishes frequency-dependent selection as a form of interaction between social and non-social selection in dyads like mated pairs or larger groups, such as neighborhoods, coalitions, and herds (Martin et al, 2022).…”
Section: Variation and Selection Of Personality Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%