1981
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.eg.06.110181.002041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Social Impacts of Soft and Hard Energy Systems: The Lovins' Claims as a Social Science Challenge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lovins stated that an energy path can be characterized as a complex, interactive set of mutually reinforcing, internally consistent features that together constitute an energy system; in effect, a sociotechnical system [80]. The main features and their interrelations were identified as follows:…”
Section: Thoughts On the Soft (Energy) Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lovins stated that an energy path can be characterized as a complex, interactive set of mutually reinforcing, internally consistent features that together constitute an energy system; in effect, a sociotechnical system [80]. The main features and their interrelations were identified as follows:…”
Section: Thoughts On the Soft (Energy) Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors working in this vein emphasize the need for appreciating the existence of multiple identities in the process of environmental governance, in order to move decision-making from "technical reason to political reason" while exploring deliberation and participation in politics as a way of "extending the public sphere" and providing a "normative basis of democracy" (Murphy 2007, 7). The role of environmental world views in the formation of the attitudes, values, and assumptions that underpin public preferences is a frequent theme in this literature (Kuhn 2008), as is the importance of scale and participation in alternative policy commitments to energy (Morrison and Lodwick 1981).…”
Section: Connecting Energy Discourse and Identity: An Uncharted Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors working in this vein emphasize the need for appreciating the existence of multiple identities in the process of environmental governance, to move decision making from "technical reason to political reason" while exploring deliberation and participation in politics as a way of "extending the public sphere" and providing a "normative basis of democracy" (Murphy 2007, 7). The role of environmental worldviews in the formation of the values and assumptions that underpin public preferences is a frequent theme in this literature (Kuhn 2008), as is the importance of scale and participation in alternative policy commitments to energy (Morrison and Lodwick 1981;Devine-Wright 2007).…”
Section: Connecting Energy Discourse and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%