The Social Norms of Tax Compliance: Evidence from Australia, Singapore, and the United States

Abstract

Tax compliance is a concern to governments around the world. Prior research (Alm, J. and I. Sanchez: 1995, KYKLOS 48, 3–19) has attributed unexplained inter-country differences in compliance rates to differences in social norms. Economics researchers studying tax compliance in the United States (U.S.) (see for example J. Andreoni et al.: 1998, Journal of Economic Literature 36, 818–860) have called for more attention to social (as opposed to economic) influences on tax compliance. In this study, we extend this prior research by explicitly examining the role of social norms [Cialdini, R. and M. Trost: 1998, The Handbook of Social Psychology (Oxford University Press, New York)] on tax compliance in three different countries. We test our research hypotheses using a hypothetical compliance scenario, which was administered in Australia, Singapore, and the U.S. There were differences in compliance rates and social norms among the three countries. Factor analysis of the social norm questions identified three distinct social norm constructs. Two of these factors were significant in explaining tax compliance behavior. The first and most influential factor was taxpayers’ own personal moral beliefs, along with the beliefs of those close to them (e.g., friends and important others). The second significant factor represented societal views of proper behavior. We conclude that social norms help to explain tax compliance intentions and why tax compliance rates are higher than would be predicted by strictly economic models. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007social norms, tax compliance,

Power, justice, and trust: A moderated mediation analysis of tax compliance among Ethiopian business owners

“…A worrying fact in this respect is that while the government budget in many countries is overwhelmed by deficit financing, many citizens continually evade taxes Asaminew, 2010;Waud, 1986). Consequently, taxpayers' adherence to applicable taxation laws is something all governments throughout the world aim to secure (Bobek, Roberts, & Sweeney, 2007). Therefore, understanding what drives tax compliance is an important topic for scientific study.…”

Fiscal Efficiency of Vat in Eu Member States

“…In accordance with the neoclassical noncompliance gap theory created by Allingham and Sandmo (1972), the gap size is influenced bysuch factors as tax rates, the level of sanctions (punishment) for tax evasion, probability of fiscal control (Allingham and Sandmo, 1972). According to the behavioral noncompliance gap theory, the tendency to pay taxes may be influenced by such factors as subjective perception of fiscal control probability (Dhami and Al-Nowaihi, 2007) the presence of positive stimuli for paying taxes (Alm, 2013, Feld andFrey, 2002), social norms (Bobek, 2007) or psychological costs (Hashmizade et al 2013). It follows from the research concerning the size of the noncompliance gap with regard to VAT that such factors as weighted average tax rate, law system effectiveness, the sense of taxation justice among tax-payers, etc.…”

The Impact of Social Norms, Trust, and Fairness on Voluntary Tax Compliance in Austria

“…sample In order to make sure that statistically significant results can be achieved, and a small interaction effect detected, the appropriate 340 management · volume 12 Descriptive norms Bobek, Roberts, and Sweeney (2007) Subjective norms Blanthorne and Kaplan (2008) Personal norms Bobek, Roberts, and Sweeney (2007) Trust Kogler et al (2013) Perceived fairness Nakayachi and Cvetkovich (2010); Herda and Lavelle (2011) Voluntary tax compl. Blanthorne and Kaplan (2008); Kogler et al (2013) sample size was determined.…”