1996
DOI: 10.1123/jsep.18.4.420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Social Physique Anxiety Scale: Reliability and Construct Validity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Scores ranged from 12 to 60; a high score indicates a high level of concern about others evaluating one's body (the responses to some items were reverse scored). Internal and test-retest reliability have been found to be adequate with a number of adult samples (Hart et al, 1989;Martin, Rejeski, Leary, McAuley, & Bane, 1997;Motl & Conroy, 2000;Petrie, Diehl, Rogers, & Johnson, 1996). Internal reliability was high among both men and women in the present sample (α > .80).…”
Section: Body Image Measuresmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Scores ranged from 12 to 60; a high score indicates a high level of concern about others evaluating one's body (the responses to some items were reverse scored). Internal and test-retest reliability have been found to be adequate with a number of adult samples (Hart et al, 1989;Martin, Rejeski, Leary, McAuley, & Bane, 1997;Motl & Conroy, 2000;Petrie, Diehl, Rogers, & Johnson, 1996). Internal reliability was high among both men and women in the present sample (α > .80).…”
Section: Body Image Measuresmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…According to Eklund et al (1996, p. 293), "There is a need for further investigation of the psychometric properties of the SPAS given the conceptual concerns identified on the basis of face validity" (p. 293). Petrie, Diehl, Rogers, and Johnson (1996) examined the validity of the higher order model for both men and women. The fit indexes indicated that SPAS-12 was better represented by the higher order model for both men and women (Petrie et al, 1996).…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petrie, Diehl, Rogers, and Johnson (1996) examined the validity of the higher order model for both men and women. The fit indexes indicated that SPAS-12 was better represented by the higher order model for both men and women (Petrie et al, 1996). Eklund et al (1997) also revealed that the higher order model had better fit for both men and women and that modifying Item 2 appeared to resolve the inconsistency of responses for that item.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hart et al (1989) reported that for two samples (n 5 89 and n 5 56) a principal components analysis showed that all 12 items loaded greater than 0.55 on a single unrotated component. However, other studies have obtained multiple factors (Eklund, Mack, & Hart, 1996;Motl & Conroy, 2000;Petrie, Diehl, Rogers, & Johnson, 1996), although these factors may simply represent positively-versus negatively-worded items (Motl & Conroy, 2000). They found that a unidimensional solution better fit both 9-item and 7-item versions of the scale.…”
Section: Divergent/discriminantmentioning
confidence: 91%