2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40100-016-0059-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The social pillar of sustainability: a quantitative approach at the farm level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The construction of the Global Sustainability Index (GSI) has been retained useful as to evaluate the sustainability performance of AFN from a systemic perspective. Indeed, AFN have often been evaluated for their contribution to social reconnection of consumers and producers and for their capacity to be a lever for local development (Gaviglio et al, 2016;Blasi et al, 2015); in other cases, studies have been conducted on some specific agro-food products or supply chain (Galli et al, 2015); finally, other researches about the correlation between local food chains and sustainability have been conducted (Brunori et al, 2016), but quantitative results are missing. Through the GSI, our aim is to assess the performances of three pillars of sustainability (environmental, economic, and social), independently of the product or supply chain.…”
Section: The Global Sustainability Index and The Assessment Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construction of the Global Sustainability Index (GSI) has been retained useful as to evaluate the sustainability performance of AFN from a systemic perspective. Indeed, AFN have often been evaluated for their contribution to social reconnection of consumers and producers and for their capacity to be a lever for local development (Gaviglio et al, 2016;Blasi et al, 2015); in other cases, studies have been conducted on some specific agro-food products or supply chain (Galli et al, 2015); finally, other researches about the correlation between local food chains and sustainability have been conducted (Brunori et al, 2016), but quantitative results are missing. Through the GSI, our aim is to assess the performances of three pillars of sustainability (environmental, economic, and social), independently of the product or supply chain.…”
Section: The Global Sustainability Index and The Assessment Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, SAFA turns out to be a useful benchmark paradigm for highlighting the differences between the different approaches and for making the assessment results more comparable [20]. A comparison of several applications for the assessment of sustainability (IDEA-Indicateurs de Durabilité des Exploitations Agricoles or Farm Sustainability Indicators; RISE-Response-Inducing Sustainability Evaluation model; SAFA; SOSTAR -analysis of farm technical efficiency and impacts on environmental and economic sustainability, MOTIFS-Monitoring Tool for Integrated Farm Sustainability and 4Agro) at farms in Northern Italy has made it possible to study the choice of indicators, the availability of data and the involvement of stakeholders, as well as to add more evaluation scales for agriculture (the environment, society, the economy and governance) [21][22][23].…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the growing recognition of the role of agriculture in safeguarding the social heritage of territories, their culture and traditions, the assessment of social sustainability has received less attention than that of environmental and economic sustainability [50][51][52]. This may relate to the fact that the perception of social issues is heterogeneous and causes a lack of conceptual clarity [13].…”
Section: Social Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this framework, the functional and aesthetic roles of rural buildings (Indicator 20) and the farm landscape (Indicator 21) have been included into the social pillar because of positive or negative social externalities for the rural areas [51].…”
Section: Social Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation