The Social-Psychological Context of Human Values: The Reciprocal Relationship between Personality Traits and Value Orientations

Anýžová, Petra

doi:10.13060/00380288.2017.53.3.337

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The relationship between values and personality traits is more complex than most psychological studies assume, as some personality traits that might be expected to have a strong cognitive component are in uenced more by values, while others, vice versa, are weakly associated with values. The in uence of values on traits largely occurs on a conscious level, has a decidedly cognitive basis, and may vary in the long term and change its polarity in response to strong confrontations with the social environment, while the strength and polarity of the in uence of personality traits on values remains stable over time (Anýžová, 2017).…”

Section: Analysis Of the Latest Studies And Publicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Value Orientations of People Learning Toward Different Types of Culture

Rybak

2018

JECS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim. The aim of the research is to generalize the most topical scientific approaches to value orientations, disclose the importance of value orientations in personality development, and highlight the influence of culture on value orientation development. Methods. One hundred and eighty Ukrainian participants comleted the Milton’s Rokeach Test ‘Value Orientations’ (1973), Vladimir’s Sopov and Ludmila’s Karpushyna Morphology Test of Life Values (2001), Ludmila’s Pochebut Test ‘Cultural and Value Orientations’ (2004), Ivan’s Diachuk Test ‘Understanding of Moral Values’ (2010)Dmitrij’s Leontiev Test ‘Life Sense Orientations’ (2000). Answers to the tests made it possible to divide participants by different types of culture and built out hierarchy of values preferable for them. Results. The analysis shows that two clusters of examinees leaning toward different types of culture are empirically outlined. Their value orientations and dependence of the established values on the type of culture they lean toward is studied. The research has also indicated that in traditional culture and modern culture there is different hierarchy of values. Conclusions. Outlining of such types of culture as traditional, modern and dynamically developing culture enables clarification of special features of culture in general. Division of culture as the system into simpler subsystems, which are characterized by certain features, enables analysis of the very phenomenon of culture in detail. Besides that, in this study the importance of values and value orientations as an integral characteristic of culture is stressed.

show abstract

Section: Analysis Of the Latest Studies And Publicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Value Orientations of People Learning Toward Different Types of Culture

Rybak

2018

JECS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to D. Karp, values provide an answer to the basic existential questions by helping to give meaning for people's lives (Karp, 2020). Therefore, people's values determine common aspirational goals, which, in turn, motivate their actions and serve as guiding principles in their lives (Anýžová, 2017;Kluckhohn, 1951;Meeussen, Agneessens, Delvaux, Phalet, 2018). Individual's behavior can be ambivalent in terms of values; they can serve more than a motivational purpose.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Manifestation of Ethnicity and Values: the Case Study From the Eastern Latvia

Makarevičs

Iliško

2021

SIE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Values has been explored in connection to a deeper understanding of human behavior. Values provide the answer to the basic existential questions, help to provide meaning in one’s life. Values are the key aspects of one’s self-esteem. They reflect diverse aspects of one’s social identity. According to a number of scientists, ethnic identity is a part of social identity. A number of studies in psychology has a focus on the connection between ethnicity and ethnic values. There are two main approaches towards the study of values can be distinguished. On the one hand, there are values that have the existential basis for the existence of people. On the other hand, the information about ethnic values can have applied aspect. The aim of this study is to identify differences in value orientation among representatives of two main linguistic groups that live in Eastern Latvia: the group of Latvian and Russian-speaking participants. The second goal is to explore the influence of religion, age and gender on the values of the research participants. The methodology used for the purpose of this study was to determine value orientation towards family, religious and friendship. The authors discovered statistically significant differences only in relation to a value of friendship. This value turned out to be the highest among the Russian-speaking group as compared to the Latvian-speaking group, as well as in the Orthodox group as compared to the group of Catholics.

show abstract

“…Neuroticism is defined by its holders' tendency to over-worry, and experience negative emotions such as sadness and anxiety (Costa & McCrae, 1985), and was found to be positively associated with the Higher Order Value of Conservatism (Anýžová, 2017;Fischer & Boer, 2015). Meanwhile, the majority of engineering students were found scoring high on Neuroticism scales (Cárdenas Moren, et al, 2020), as there has been discourse criticising the inadequate teaching of creativity in engineering classrooms, where creativity is not being encouraged or praised (Atwood & Pretz, 2016).…”

Section: Linking Personal Values To Empathy Creativity and Human-cent...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Priming and Mining the Civil Engineering Mindset: How Personal Values and Perfectionism Shape Societal Engagement and Consideration in Design

Al Kakoun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are many ongoing calls for the integration of public welfare needs and concerns into engineering curricula and practice; for example, promoting social consciousness, human-centred design, and other socially-related frameworks. However, some engineering students still seem to devalue or resist these initiatives. This project attempts to overcome this problem by exploring a new methodology to facilitate such integrations, whilst bypassing the possible resistance. In the first intervention, this project explores to facilitate such notions via exploiting the psychology-informed approach of priming. Results of the first intervention showed that the priming initially intended to raise empathy (and by extension, social consciousness) scores unexpectedly resulted in significantly decreasing them. This initiated the second and third interventions, which explored how different key facets of the mindset (i.e., personal values and perfectionism, respectively) contribute to decisionmaking, particularly in contexts of human-centred designing and socially relevant initiatives, in civil engineering design. Such research on exploring the engineering mindset was to also inform the underexplored research literature on the subjective nature of sustainable decision-making in engineering. .. The second and third interventions therefore serve to fill the gap on addressing the subjective nature of sustainable decision-making in engineering, by researching to understand how the different facets of the mindset (i.e., personal values and perfectionism, respectively) dictate decision-making and facilitate (or hinder) social engagement and consideration in human-centric designing and socially considerate contexts. The influence of priming on such decision-making processes and social considerations were also observed in light of the different facets of the mindset. Results show that the majority of civil engineering undergraduates hold dominant Higher Order Values rooted in Self Transcendence (60.87%), and were categorised as perfectionists (74.48%). Findings indicate that those with Higher Order Value rooted in Self Transcendence were significantly less likely to produce what I term Communal Designs (i.e., designs that inform the metaphysical as well as the physical needs of the end-user), compared to those with dominant values rooted in the Higher Order Value of Openness to Change. Students were also found to transition in value towards the Higher Order Value of Conservation with time (i.e., with transition from year 1 to year 3 in a civil engineering programme), and thus transition away from their likelihood of producing Communal Designs by extension. Similarly, those categorised as perfectionists were significantly less likely to produce Communal Designs compared to those categorised as non-perfectionists. Perfectionists were later found to be associated with the Higher Order Value of Conservation when resumed back to the literature for sense-making of the present findings. Underlying common motives of Self-Protection and Anxiety-Av...

show abstract

The Social-Psychological Context of Human Values: The Reciprocal Relationship between Personality Traits and Value Orientations

Cited by 4 publications

References 42 publications

Value Orientations of People Learning Toward Different Types of Culture

Value Orientations of People Learning Toward Different Types of Culture

Manifestation of Ethnicity and Values: the Case Study From the Eastern Latvia

Priming and Mining the Civil Engineering Mindset: How Personal Values and Perfectionism Shape Societal Engagement and Consideration in Design

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About