The Social Security Function of Agriculture in China

Abstract

On the basis of the Lewis model, this paper addresses the theoretical foundations of the social security function of the agricultural sector and investigates the impact of this function on Chinese development. We argue that the agricultural sector and secure agricultural land holdings are important means, in the absence of comprehensive government provision of social security, in insuring rural residents and rural–urban migrants against risks and uncertainties. Given a large rural population and massive rural–urban migration, secure access to land for both rural and migrant populations in China has helped the economy avoid systemic risk and helped to maintain social stability. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Designing Property Rights over Land in Rural China

“…Peasants can work in the urban areas as migrant workers, but do not enjoy the same entitlements enjoyed by urban residents (Cheng and Selden, ; Song, ). While this avoids explicit costs on the part of municipal governments in accommodating these peasant migrant workers, implicit social costs exist due to the fact that a sizable population of temporary residents lack adequate social services (Bosker et al ., ; Wang et al ., ).…”

The Real Origin of Global Financial Imbalances

“…The impact of the slowdown in exports in the aftermath of the financial crisis is illuminating. In February 2009, about 20 million migrant workers lost their jobs and returned to the countryside, although many of them returned when exports recovered (Wang et al ., ). It follows from this that a renminbi appreciation will not eliminate China's trade surplus but will stifle development.…”

Mind the gaps: a political economy of the multiple dimensions of China's rural-urban divide

“…Once an area is declared as urban, the previously collectively owned land becomes public land at the disposal of the city government, and there is very limited compensation for farmers. See Wang and Weaver () and Wang et al () for more discussion about this issue.…”