The social world of Australian practice nurses and the influence of medical dominance: An analysis of the literature

Abstract

In Australia, the number of practice nurses is growing at a rapid rate. On the nursing landscape, this group of nurses stand out because of their relationship with the Australian Government who both fund them, and concern themselves with their continuing professional development. This paper provides a construction of the social world of Australian practice nurses, identifying stakeholders in the business of practice nursing. Literature produced by the various social world segments is analysed for the influence of medical dominance on the role, image, power and politics of practice nurses.

Barriers to pharmacist prescribing: a scoping review comparing the UK, New Zealand, Canadian and Australian experiences

“…Maintenance of the medical professional domain has been described as a barrier to expanding scopes of nursing practice in a number of specialities . Despite this, nurse practitioners have legislated prescribing rights in Australia, contingent upon expanded scopes of clinical practice founded on specific education and training, and a shared understanding of roles within multidisciplinary teams.…”

The nursing contribution to chronic disease management: A case of public expectation? Qualitative findings from a multiple case study design in England and Wales

“…Service user reservations were particularly noticeable in the primary care nurse model where the patriarchal division of labour was most likely to exist (Mills and Hallinan, 2009), and unlike the other models, the nurse is employed directly by the doctor reinforcing traditional patterns of power. Extension of the primary care nurse role in CDM has also resulted in a significant increase in workload for the nurse (Daughtry and Hayter, 2010).…”

The Integrative Medicine Team—Is Biomedical Dominance Inevitable?

“…specialized knowledge (social closure), the co-option of elements from other professional domains, and the marketing to and acceptance of professional authority by the layperson that is often backed by government legislation and funding. 10,[12][13][14][15] There is continuing debate about whether the neoliberal economic reforms of the past few decades have significantly weakened biomedical dominance. 10,13,14 Certainly, the freer capitalistic market has coincided with a rise in patient demand for TCAM, legislative changes legitimizing TCAM, insurance funding for TCAM, and changes in consumer expectations and behavior.…”