ArticleRecent research has suggested that capstone or senior seminar courses are a common feature of American undergraduate sociology and psychology curricula (Hauhart and Grahe 2010;McKinney and Busher 2011). Until very recently, however, capstone studies in sociology and psychology have not, by and large, sought comparative data between institutions nor addressed with any perceptiveness and rigor the organizational and pedagogical features of capstone courses. This lack of comparative data has made it difficult to develop a broader understanding of the nature and role of capstone courses within sociology and psychology. Beginning in 2007 in sociology, Kain (2007) inaugurated research into the general availability of capstones and senior seminars. Hauhart and Grahe (2010) then extended, and broadened, this line of research for both sociology and psychology through a regional survey and also explored the nature, characteristics, and mechanics of the typical capstone course in sociology and psychology. Recently, in a smaller comparative study, McKinney and Busher (2011) confirmed a number of those findings with respect to sociology. In psychology, Perlman and McCann (1999a, 1999b produced a series of studies that identified capstones or senior seminars as central to the core psychology curriculum in American higher education. However, their work did little to contribute to our understanding of the mechanics of those courses and the pedagogical methods employed.This article reports the results of a national survey regarding sociology and psychology capstones. The national survey project was developed to build on the regional survey data we previously reported (Hauhart and Grahe 2010). On one hand,
AbstractPrevious research on capstones in sociology and psychology has suggested that there is a typical capstone experience required by three quarters of all four-year colleges and universities in the United States. This article reports results from a national survey that confirm that sociology and psychology capstone courses conform generally to a common format. The findings further indicate that factors related to student limits and time limits predominate with respect to those variables that produce less successful course outcomes. A review of the social science capstone literature and the pedagogical best practices literature suggests that student limitations and time limitations can be attenuated by curricular, structural, and resourceallocation changes.