1989
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/22/10/007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sommerfeld screening parameter σ2and theoretically calculated energies of atomic inner shells

Abstract: Using the recent theoretical atomic energy values of Huang et al. (1976), the values of the Sommerfeld screening parameter sigma 2 have been calculated for those spin doublet levels where calculations could not formerly be performed owing to the lack of experimental energy values. The method used was described earlier by Burr and Carson (1974) and involves no errors arising from the truncation of the series expansion of the Sommerfeld-Dirac relativistic energy expression. It is found that: (i) sigma 2 is a fun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…one must therefore subtract the appropriate workfunction, which is on average about 4 eV (Lotz 1970, Carlson 1975, from the values of Huang et al It is, however, seen that even after doing this the values of Huang et a / still remain, in most cases, larger than our values. This emphasizes once again the need for a fresh look at the calculations of Huang er al(1976), as was pointed out by us in our earlier papers (Misra et a/ 1989(Misra et a/ , 1990.…”
Section: D Misramentioning
confidence: 72%
“…one must therefore subtract the appropriate workfunction, which is on average about 4 eV (Lotz 1970, Carlson 1975, from the values of Huang et al It is, however, seen that even after doing this the values of Huang et a / still remain, in most cases, larger than our values. This emphasizes once again the need for a fresh look at the calculations of Huang er al(1976), as was pointed out by us in our earlier papers (Misra et a/ 1989(Misra et a/ , 1990.…”
Section: D Misramentioning
confidence: 72%