2021
DOI: 10.3390/cells10051083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The SOS Error-Prone DNA Polymerase V Mutasome and β-Sliding Clamp Acting in Concert on Undamaged DNA and during Translesion Synthesis

Abstract: In the mid 1970s, Miroslav Radman and Evelyn Witkin proposed that Escherichia coli must encode a specialized error-prone DNA polymerase (pol) to account for the 100-fold increase in mutations accompanying induction of the SOS regulon. By the late 1980s, genetic studies showed that SOS mutagenesis required the presence of two “UV mutagenesis” genes, umuC and umuD, along with recA. Guided by the genetics, decades of biochemical studies have defined the predicted error-prone DNA polymerase as an activated complex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance, this is the most studied TLS-polymerase, with orthologs identified in diverse prokaryotes and mobile genetic elements ( Vaisman et al, 2012 ), such as the homologs mucAB described in plasmids ( Perry and Walker, 1982 ) and rumAB in integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs) ( Kulaeva et al, 1995 ). The function of UmuDC was first observed in the 70s, by Miroslav Radman and Evelyn Witkin (Radman, 1974 ; Sikand et al, 2021 ), although at that time the specific polymerase responsible for the mutagenic activity in the SOS response had not been elucidated ( Sikand et al , 2021 ). Genetic identification of umuDC genes was first reported in a search for E. coli strains lacking UV-inducible mutagenesis ( Kato and Shinoura, 1977 ).…”
Section: Translesion Synthesis Mutagenesis and Bacterial Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In accordance, this is the most studied TLS-polymerase, with orthologs identified in diverse prokaryotes and mobile genetic elements ( Vaisman et al, 2012 ), such as the homologs mucAB described in plasmids ( Perry and Walker, 1982 ) and rumAB in integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs) ( Kulaeva et al, 1995 ). The function of UmuDC was first observed in the 70s, by Miroslav Radman and Evelyn Witkin (Radman, 1974 ; Sikand et al, 2021 ), although at that time the specific polymerase responsible for the mutagenic activity in the SOS response had not been elucidated ( Sikand et al , 2021 ). Genetic identification of umuDC genes was first reported in a search for E. coli strains lacking UV-inducible mutagenesis ( Kato and Shinoura, 1977 ).…”
Section: Translesion Synthesis Mutagenesis and Bacterial Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, early genetic studies have shown that RecA performs a third role in umuDC -dependent SOS mutagenesis ( Blanco et al, 1982 ; Nohmi et al, 1988 ; Dutreix et al, 1989 ; Sweasy et al, 1990 ). In vitro experiments have shown that RecA bound to ssDNA is necessary for mutagenesis, with latest models suggesting that the “mutasome” complex operating in TLS is a molecular assembly of UmuD’ 2 C-RecA-ATP (reviewed by Fujii and Fuchs 2020 ; Jaszczur et al, 2016 ; Sikand et al, 2021 ). RecFOR proteins also have a role in the formation of the RecA filament necessary for UmuD’ 2 C TLS ( Fujii et al , 2006 ).…”
Section: Translesion Synthesis Mutagenesis and Bacterial Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pCol1B9 D37712 plasmid carried a locus that was absent from pCol1B9 4/74 , namely the impC-umuCD operon ( Fig. S3 ) which encodes the error-prone DNA polymerase V responsible for the increased mutation rate linked to the SOS stress response in E. coli (Sikand et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pCol1B9 D37712 plasmid carried a locus that was absent from pCol1B9 4/74 , namely the impC-umuCD operon (Fig. S3) which encodes the error-prone DNA polymerase V responsible for the increased mutation rate linked to the SOS stress response in E. coli (Sikand et al, 2021).…”
Section: Comparison Of D23580 and D37712 Plasmidsmentioning
confidence: 99%