1970
DOI: 10.1515/islm.1970.46.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sources of Islamic Civilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Greif based his claim on the interpretation of a single Arabic term, umma, attributed to Cahen, who did not use it. Instead umma appears in Von Grunebaum's entry in the Cambridge History of Islam , “The sources of Islamic civilization,” without being associated with a ‘collective’ mentality (Greif, ; Von Grunebaum, ). On the other hand, there is evidence from the Middle East of society and the state rewarding individual achievements and of social and state's recognition of innovation (Al‐Hasan & Hill, ; Brentjes & Morrison, ; Gutas, ).…”
Section: Cultural Factors: Institutions Islamic Law and Men Of Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greif based his claim on the interpretation of a single Arabic term, umma, attributed to Cahen, who did not use it. Instead umma appears in Von Grunebaum's entry in the Cambridge History of Islam , “The sources of Islamic civilization,” without being associated with a ‘collective’ mentality (Greif, ; Von Grunebaum, ). On the other hand, there is evidence from the Middle East of society and the state rewarding individual achievements and of social and state's recognition of innovation (Al‐Hasan & Hill, ; Brentjes & Morrison, ; Gutas, ).…”
Section: Cultural Factors: Institutions Islamic Law and Men Of Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search for pattern and rules for its formation in communities was pursued by ecologists, with increasingly involved sampling and analytic technique, and was perpetuated in the work of John Curtis and Robert Whittaker (Barbour 1996). Michael Austin (1985Austin ( , 1989 (von Grunebaum 1970). Because Arabic and Persian cultures did not emphasize science, and because Byzantine science barely rose above the mediocre level of Roman science, one might guess that Arabic language science would be no better than Byzantine science.…”
Section: Historians' Gleasonmentioning
confidence: 99%