2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sources of Strength Australia project: A cluster randomised controlled trial of a peer-connectedness school-based program to promote help-seeking in adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A robust evidence base has demonstrated Sources of Strength ’s efficacy in increasing school belonging, healthy coping skills, and related protective factors (Calear et al, 2022; Petrova et al, 2015; Wyman et al, 2010). Sources of Strength is an upstream, peer-led, suicide prevention program aimed at promoting mental health and well-being broadly through increasing help-seeking behaviors and peer connectedness (LoMurray, 2005).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A robust evidence base has demonstrated Sources of Strength ’s efficacy in increasing school belonging, healthy coping skills, and related protective factors (Calear et al, 2022; Petrova et al, 2015; Wyman et al, 2010). Sources of Strength is an upstream, peer-led, suicide prevention program aimed at promoting mental health and well-being broadly through increasing help-seeking behaviors and peer connectedness (LoMurray, 2005).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many young people with suicide behavior do not seek help, possibly because of stigma, shame, embarrassment, and limited mental health knowledge (Calear et al, 2022). The early identification of students at risk is important for suicide prevention (Torok et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the evidence indicating the beneficial effects of educational suicide prevention programs, certain limitations have been raised. Not all implemented prevention programs in schools have proven effective [ 19 ] and some programs seem to have differential effects for specific groups (e.g., more favourable outcomes for females than for males) [ 20 ]. Also, there is substantial variation and uncertainty regarding their theoretical foundation [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%