2020
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The southernmost record and an update of the geographical range of the Atlantic chupare, Styracura schmardae (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes)

Abstract: The present study established the southernmost distribution range for the Chupare stingray Styracura schmardae based on a specimen caught on the easternmost portion of Ceará State, northeastern Brazil. Identification was based on diagnostic morphological characters and molecular data (sequence of the mitochondrial DNA gene nd2; 1046 bp). This record expands the known distribution range for this species by more than 1200 km and confirms that S. schmardae is distributed in more than one biogeographical province.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to a relatively high number of elasmobranch species regionally, the present‐study small‐scale fishery also captured species known for their low abundance and rarity in Brazil, as for example Styracura cf . schmardae (Jucá‐Queiroz et al, 2008, Sales et al., 2020) and Odontaspis ferox (Santander‐Neto, Faria, Castro, & Burgess, 2011), or at least not common in the coastal area, as for example Rhincodon typus (Faria et al., 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to a relatively high number of elasmobranch species regionally, the present‐study small‐scale fishery also captured species known for their low abundance and rarity in Brazil, as for example Styracura cf . schmardae (Jucá‐Queiroz et al, 2008, Sales et al., 2020) and Odontaspis ferox (Santander‐Neto, Faria, Castro, & Burgess, 2011), or at least not common in the coastal area, as for example Rhincodon typus (Faria et al., 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%