2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12461.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The space density of cataclysmic variables: constraints from the ROSAT North Ecliptic Pole survey

Abstract: We use the ROSAT North Ecliptic Pole (NEP) survey to construct a small, but purely X‐ray flux‐limited sample of cataclysmic variable stars (CVs). The sample includes only four systems, two of which (RX J1715.6+6856 and RX J1831.7+6511) are new discoveries. We present time‐resolved spectroscopy of the new CVs and measure orbital periods of 1.64 ± 0.02 and 4.01 ± 0.03 h for RX J1715.6+6856 and RX J1831.7+6511, respectively. We also estimate distances for all the CVs in our sample, based mainly on their apparent … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
83
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
6
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For a maximum distance of 2 kpc the model is dominated by the Galactic disk whereas the bulge is not relevant. The resulting number of CVs, regardless of the selection effects that these systems would be subjected to in order to be detected, is 0.18 and 0.54 for a local CV density 1 × 10 −5 and 3 × 10 −5 pc −3 , respectively (these values cover the range of densities found in recent studies; see, e.g., Ak et al 2008;Grindlay et al 2005;Pretorius et al 2007). The probability to detect 3 or more nearby CVs when in fact ∼ 0.54 are expected is low ( 1% for a Poisson distribution).…”
Section: Distance Constraints For the CV Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For a maximum distance of 2 kpc the model is dominated by the Galactic disk whereas the bulge is not relevant. The resulting number of CVs, regardless of the selection effects that these systems would be subjected to in order to be detected, is 0.18 and 0.54 for a local CV density 1 × 10 −5 and 3 × 10 −5 pc −3 , respectively (these values cover the range of densities found in recent studies; see, e.g., Ak et al 2008;Grindlay et al 2005;Pretorius et al 2007). The probability to detect 3 or more nearby CVs when in fact ∼ 0.54 are expected is low ( 1% for a Poisson distribution).…”
Section: Distance Constraints For the CV Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our current understanding of the CV population suggests that the long period systems are typically younger than the short period systems and so-called period bouncers, and consequently have different spatial distributions with respect to the Galactic plane (e.g. Pretorius et al 2007a;Pretorius et al 2007b). However, since the majority of sources in our sample are long period systems, we expect that their distribution scale hight is about 120-150 pc (e.g.…”
Section: Spatial Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume probed per XMM-pointing is ∼1.1 × 10 5 pc 3 . The CV space density is not well known, with recent observational constraints derived from the ROSAT Bright Survey (Schwope et al 2002) and the ROSAT NEP Survey (Pretorius et al 2007) for non-magnetic CVs giving ρ ∼ 1.5 × 10 −6 . .…”
Section: Properties and Characteristics Of The Xgps Source Samplementioning
confidence: 99%