The space left for regional integration (or lack thereof): Structural causes of institutional fragmentation in Latin America (1991-2019)

Abstract

Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto e distribuído sob os termos da Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons, que permite uso irrestrito, distribuição e reprodução em qualquer meio, desde que o autor e a fonte originais sejam creditados.

Fuzzy modeling for toolkit synthesis of managing international digital flows

“…This model is also of particular practical relevance in terms of the widespread increase of the importance of improving the spatial location of production and the elaboration of territorial development strategies in many countries [19] in conditions of modification of the very essence of the principles of territorial placement of production under the influence of IDF expansion. Implementation of these strategies is done through the establishment of the appropriate statewide and regional institutions of economic and social management, that takes into account both the trends of partial fragmentation and regionalization of traditional manufacturing and trade industries [20], and pervasive influence of the IDF [21]. Increasing scientific validity of projects and plans for territorial development, including the location of industrial and IT clusters in inter-and intrastate macroregions by means of the tools of formal models, is also a necessary condition for overcoming or mitigating location errors due to subjective decisions, their lack of forethought and calculation, and especially -to the lobbying pressure, reflecting private or parochial interests, but at the same time, leading to unnecessary economic losses and increased social and political tensions.…”

Regional Governance in Latin America: The More the Merrier?

“…In a nutshell, the skeptic and at times openly critical view of overlapping regional governance institutions offered by scholars like Laura Gómez-Mera (2015) deserves another round of investigation. The same holds for the scholarship that insists in criticizing governance institutions in Latin America as incomplete, fluid, or in permanent crisis (Rodriguez and Haag 2022;Nolte 2021b;Mariano et al 2021). The metrics by which these organizations were evaluated recurrently borrow from the more hierarchical European model, thus ignoring the Latin American protagonism with respect to the Liberal International Order.…”

Auge y declive del regionalismo latinoamericano en la primera marea rosa: lecciones para el presente

“…Además, la falta de liderazgo de Brasil ha tenido un impacto negativo en los procesos de integración, especialmente en América del Sur, y ha contribuido a la fragmentación institucional del regionalismo latinoamericano (Rodriguez y Haag, 2022). Pero durante la presidencia pro tempore de CELAC (2020 y 2021), México asumió un papel protagónico en el proceso de cooperación e integración regional, en parte en coordinación con Argentina.…”