2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.08.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Space Rider Programme: End user's needs and payload applications survey as driver for mission and system definition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not to mention the benefits the research will bring to the space biomedical community preparing for lunar exploration and private spaceflight. To that end, the novel spacecraft developed for these purposes ([14]- [16], [18], [20]) are hoped to feature commercial payload slots available on them, possibly using CubeSat units as an international standard as is already done for commercial experiment racks on the ISS. Further promoting the credibility, commercialisation and improved development of CubeSat biomedical payloads in a positive feedback loop for the sector.…”
Section: Further Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Not to mention the benefits the research will bring to the space biomedical community preparing for lunar exploration and private spaceflight. To that end, the novel spacecraft developed for these purposes ([14]- [16], [18], [20]) are hoped to feature commercial payload slots available on them, possibly using CubeSat units as an international standard as is already done for commercial experiment racks on the ISS. Further promoting the credibility, commercialisation and improved development of CubeSat biomedical payloads in a positive feedback loop for the sector.…”
Section: Further Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excellent reviews of historical and future biomedical CubeSat missions can be found in [17], [25], [26], [28], [29], [51]- [53]. Although given the standard features of mission payloads discussed in this report (namely miniaturised and autonomous ones, capable of in-situ analysis), many other relevant material can be found and dissected from non-CubeSat missions such as Eu:CROPIS, the ShiJian, Tianzhou and Bion spacecraft, and the future Space Rider programme [16], [18].…”
Section: Concluding Table Of Pros and Consmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It might be argued that, especially for institutionally funded basic research experiments, one needs, as part of the qualification process, to demonstrate how a particular experiment responds to launch loads (static, dynamic, and combined) and how this relates to the initiation of the experiment while in microgravity. This is especially true for short-duration microgravity experiments that make use of platforms such as parabolic aircraft 45 , drop towers 46 or sounding rockets but also the more recent commercial suborbital platforms such as the Blue Origin New Shepard 47 , future Virgin Galactic White Knight 48 , Dream Chaser from Sierra Nevada Company 49 or the upcoming Space Rider from the European Space Agency 50 . It is even more alarming since our data showed that launch effects are visible directly after lift off until even 4 days post exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aiming at the development of more affordable, convenient and reliable access to space, the reusable launch vehicles (RLVs) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], such as space rider [10] and Skylon [11,12] have become a hot spot and received sustained attention during the last few decades. The RLVs will dramatically reduce the operational cost of space missions because they can be used repeatedly by quick recovering and reusing after each space mission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%