The Spanish future tense and cognitive perspective: Tense, modality, evidentiality and the reflection of the grounding process

Kratochvílová, Dana

doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2019.06.014

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…20 This modal perspective has been supported from broader perspectives, not really due to a specific perception of future as a modal form, but rather because they tend to conceive time in general as a modal construct. This is actually the cognitive view of tense (Langacker, 1991;Brisard, 1997;Kratochvílová, 2019) which, together with mood, is seen as an anchoring device. Philosophically speaking, this perspective relates to a psychological, inner conception of time (cf.…”

Section: Mirative Futurementioning

confidence: 99%

What is a Morphological Future Doing in a Si-Clause? Traces of Mirativity in Spanish

Rosique

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Mirative Futurementioning

confidence: 99%

What is a Morphological Future Doing in a Si-Clause? Traces of Mirativity in Spanish

Rosique

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In philosophy, subjectivity indicates human's practical and cognitive activities (Liu 2009: 9). However, studies investigated subjectivity mainly from the linguistic perspective on the lexical, constructional and syntactic aspects of subjectivity (House 2013;Grisot 2018;Kratochvílová 2019), lacking the philosophical perspective on the discourse level of subjectivity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Subjectivity of Discourse from the Philosophic Perspective

Bing-zhuan

2023

fil-soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Language not only objectively expresses the thought of a proposition but also indicates the speaker’s emotion, attitude, and viewpoints toward a proposition, which is called subjectivity in the study. Subjectivity is one of the main topics in philosophy. However, the phenomenon of subjectivity is mainly discussed at the word, construction, or syntactic level from the perspective of linguistics. To better the characteristics of speakers as subjects in social practice activities and cognitive activities, an analytical framework of subjectivity in discourse from the perspective of philosophy was constructed to investigate subjectivity at the discourse level. Three aspects, that is, experience, mental and communicative models, were explored. The results show that (1) the constructed analytical framework clearly shows the social characteristics of subjectivity in discourse; (2) the experience model is divided into the speaker’s social and cultural experience; (3) the mental model is construed as the speaker’s mental cognition, reflected by the speaker’s mental stance and emotion; (4) the communicative model is represented by the speaker’s communicative intention and communicative practice, including appeal, command and announcement. The study provides an analytical framework to dig up the subjective nature of language and the relationship among speakers, society and discourse. This study also enriches the research on subjectivity and discourse analysis.

show abstract

What is a morphological future doing in a si-clause? Traces of mirativity in Spanish

Rodríguez Rosique

2024

Lingua

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Spanish future tense and cognitive perspective: Tense, modality, evidentiality and the reflection of the grounding process

Cited by 6 publications

References 19 publications

What is a Morphological Future Doing in a Si-Clause? Traces of Mirativity in Spanish

What is a Morphological Future Doing in a Si-Clause? Traces of Mirativity in Spanish

Subjectivity of Discourse from the Philosophic Perspective

What is a morphological future doing in a si-clause? Traces of mirativity in Spanish

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About