The Spatial Correlations of Health Resource Agglomeration Capacities and Their Influencing Factors: Evidence from China

Abstract

We measured the health resource agglomeration capacities of 31 Chinese provinces (or municipalities) in 2004–2018 based on the entropy weight method. Using a modified spatial gravity model, we constructed and analyzed the spatial correlation network of these health resource agglomeration capacities and their influencing factors through social network analysis. We found that: (i) China’s health resource agglomeration capacity had a gradual strengthening trend, with capacity weakening from east to west (strongest in the eastern region, second strongest in the central region, and weakest in the western region). (ii) The spatial network of such capacities became more densely connected, and the network density and level (efficiency) showed an upward (downward) trend. (iii) In terms of centrality, the high-ranking provinces (or municipalities) were Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Guangdong, Shandong, Hunan, Hubei, Fujian, Anhui, Jiangxi, and Tianjin, while the low-ranking were Tibet, Qinghai, Gansu, Ningxia, Inner Mongolia, Heilongjiang, Yunnan, Guizhou, Xinjiang, Hainan, Shaanxi, and Shanxi. (iv) Block 1 (eight provinces or municipalities), including Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei, had a “net spillover” effect in the spatial network of health resource agglomeration capacities; Block 2, (seven provinces or municipalities), including Shanghai, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang, had a “bidirectional spillover” effect in the spatial network; Block 3 (seven provinces or municipalities), including Anhui, Hubei, and Hunan, had a “mediator” effect in the network; and Block 4, (nine provinces or municipalities), including Sichuan, Guizhou, and Tibet, had a “net beneficial” effect in the network. (v) The economic development, urbanization wage, and financial health expenditure levels, and population size had significant positive correlations with the spatial network of health resource agglomeration capacities. Policy recommendations to enhance the radiating role of health resources in core provinces (or municipalities), rationally allocate health resources, and transform ideas to support public health resource services were provided.

Burden of lymphoma in China, 1990−2019: an analysis of the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors study 2019

“…Many factors such as socioeconomic status and health care access contribute to lymphoma burden [ 19 – 22 ]. The urban-rural discordance of mortality rates was partly due to poor availability of medical services and insufficient protection by healthcare insurance [ 3 ].…”

Finding flaws in the spatial distribution of health workforce and its influential factors: An empirical analysis based on Chinese provincial panel data, 2010–2019

“…In addition, provinces in the eastern region are, in general, economically developed; thus, health professionals might have more incentives to work in these areas driven by a higher salary. The marketization possibly further facilitates the outflow of health labor from underdeveloped to developed regions and then accelerate spatial agglomeration ( 57 ). In this case, it is necessary for the government to carry out more effective regional-specific policies targeted at backward areas with respect to health workforce configuration based on in-depth understanding of its influential factors.…”

Geographical Pattern Evolution of Health Resources in China: Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Spatial Mismatch

“…This paper finds that factors such as children and elderly population, health care government investment, service industry added value, high quality population, medical insurance fund expenditure, and government revenue have a great direct influence on the geographical distribution of health resources, which further validates the findings of some scholars. For example, Li [ 108 ], Zheng [ 109 ], and Guo [ 110 ] found that economic development, urbanization wage, population ageing, financial health expenditure levels, and population size are key factors affecting the geographical distribution of medical resources in China. Song [ 111 ], Ding [ 112 ], and Guo [ 113 ] found that social, economic, and environmental factors have great influence on the geographical clustering and spatio-temporal evolution trends of medical resources by leveraging the Bayesian local spatiotemporal regression model and spatial econometric model.…”