The Materiality of Text – Placement, Perception, and Presence of Inscribed Texts in Classical Antiquity 2018
DOI: 10.1163/9789004379435_005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ‘Spatial Dynamics’ of Archaic and Classical Greek Epigram: Conversations among Locations, Monuments, Texts, and Viewer-Readers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 Day (2018) 99. 29 wιλότιμος is not necessarily an admirable attribute, but it does indicate some agency on Kyniska's part.…”
Section: The Epigraphic Kyniskamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Day (2018) 99. 29 wιλότιμος is not necessarily an admirable attribute, but it does indicate some agency on Kyniska's part.…”
Section: The Epigraphic Kyniskamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of their 'egocentrism', he argued that 'Greek writing was first and foremost a machine for producing sounds.' 42 Bakker has well criticized this view, observing that such inscriptions are not 'egocentric' but 'reader-oriented', that rather than engaging in monologue they are in fact involved in dialogue, answering questions which are frequently-but not always-implicit, as in the following fifth-century inscription (CEG 286): 43 πᾶσιν ἴσ᾽ ἀνθρόποις hυποκρίνομαι hόστις ἐ[ροτ]ᾶι hός μ᾽ ἀνέθεκ᾽ ἀνδρο ν· ᾿Aντιφάνες δεκάτεν To all people I answer the same, whoever asks which man dedicated me: Antiphanes, as a tithe.…”
Section: Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%