2016
DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2016.1257073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spatial dynamics of new firm births during an economic crisis: the case of Great Britain, 2004–2012

Abstract: The spatial dynamics of new firm births during an economic crisis: the case of Great Britain,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The loss of statistical significance across models indicates considerable sensitivity across specifications. This diminishes the robustness of the results and does not allow for the confirmation of a significant effect for entrepreneurship suggested by other studies (Bishop and Shilcof 2016;Williams and Vorley 2014;Williams et al 2013). The opposing effects of firm formation on employment generation-dynamism and flexibility on the one hand and the fact that most new firms tend to be small enterprises with relatively limited access to credit and high death rates, could potentially explain the sensitivity of the results to small changes in specification.…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The loss of statistical significance across models indicates considerable sensitivity across specifications. This diminishes the robustness of the results and does not allow for the confirmation of a significant effect for entrepreneurship suggested by other studies (Bishop and Shilcof 2016;Williams and Vorley 2014;Williams et al 2013). The opposing effects of firm formation on employment generation-dynamism and flexibility on the one hand and the fact that most new firms tend to be small enterprises with relatively limited access to credit and high death rates, could potentially explain the sensitivity of the results to small changes in specification.…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The opposing effects of firm formation on employment generation-dynamism and flexibility on the one hand and the fact that most new firms tend to be small enterprises with relatively limited access to credit and high death rates, could potentially explain the sensitivity of the results to small changes in specification. In addition, it could be the case that entrepreneurship is important to the restructuring or recovery phase rather than the crisis impact (Bishop and Shilcof 2016;Williams and Vorley 2014;Williams et al 2013).…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, a large bulk of studies has examined such relationships at the country level. Only a few studies have emphasized the effect of a shock on the inner territories of a given country (e.g., Bishop and Shilcof, 2017; Williams and Vorley, 2014). We believe that such an impact is manifested in different forms and different levels of intensity across sub-national regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entrepreneurship is linked to economic growth by the exploitation of market opportunities, increase in innovation and the creation of jobs (Audretsch et al, 2015;Bunten et al, 2015). The entrepreneurial characteristics of flexibility and adaptability, the generation of employment and the renewal of business bases with new, more dynamic firms are features that can particularly assist local areas at times of economic distress (Bishop and Shilcof, 2016;Williams and Vorley, 2014). However, entrepreneurship levels vary geographically in a time-persistent pattern (Audretsch and Keilbach, 2007;Bishop, 2012;Fotopoulos, 2014).…”
Section: Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%