2010
DOI: 10.1890/es10-00040.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spatial influence of aboveground diversity on belowground communities

Abstract: Abstract. Little is known about the effect of diversity surrounding a focal plant species on the belowground community under that species. At least two alternative hypotheses exist. First, studies involving a range of ecosystems and taxonomic groups have shown that changes in diversity in one group of species can promote diversity in other groups. Alternatively, many studies in soil ecology have shown that belowground communities are strongly determined by the dominant aboveground species. To better understand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nematode data were transformed using ln (x + 1) to meet assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance. Trophic diversity index (TDI) was calculated by TDI = 1/∑pi 2 , where pi is the proportion of individuals of the ith trophic group in the total community [20]. The effects of season, forest type, slope, root zone, and their potential interactions on soil and nematode properties were analyzed using four-way ANOVAs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nematode data were transformed using ln (x + 1) to meet assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance. Trophic diversity index (TDI) was calculated by TDI = 1/∑pi 2 , where pi is the proportion of individuals of the ith trophic group in the total community [20]. The effects of season, forest type, slope, root zone, and their potential interactions on soil and nematode properties were analyzed using four-way ANOVAs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restored prairie cropping systems containing a mix of native grasses, legumes, and forbs supported more diverse ant communities than switchgrass (Helms et al, 2020). In contrast, nematode diversity under switchgrass stands was similar regardless of whether switchgrass was grown in monoculture or within a diverse prairie polyculture (Bliss et al, 2010). While nematodes have smaller spatial distributions than meso‐ and macrofauna and thus the potential effects of diversity may not have been fully captured, it is also likely that different size classes, and thus different functional groups, may exhibit variable responses to plant diversity.…”
Section: Cropping System Effects On Soil Faunamentioning
confidence: 99%