2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9153182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Spatial Perspective in Post-Earthquake Evaluation to Improve Mitigation Strategies: Geostatistical Analysis of the Seismic Damage Applied to a Real Case Study

Abstract: Featured Application: Implementation of an innovative approach in the field of seismic damage analysis in cities to hierarchize the importance of the different phenomena detected. Possible applications to develop improved mitigation strategies in urban areas.Abstract: The analysis of damage in cities after an earthquake to implement mitigation strategies of seismic risk is a complex job that is usually full of uncertainties. Numerous variables affect the final result of the observable damage in a set of buildi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under this action prism, the new environmental strategic planning (ESP) models require citizen participation and leadership as instruments of change and improvement. Some examples of successful case studies that have become reference models are the following: the ESP model to address issues related to the management of closed coastal seas [24][25][26]; effectiveness of ESP in Thailand to achieve the legitimacy of the processes [27]; ESP and the use of indicators in water resources planning [28]; integrated models that develop coherent and policy relevant socio-ecological strategies, which are relevant to policies where appropriate decision frameworks need to be co-developed across the range of stakeholders and decision-makers in Coastal Bangladesh [29]; integrated sustainability models in management organizations [30]; identify key governance challenges that cultivating collective action, accountability, decision spaces for stakeholder interaction regarding decision-making, investment, action, and outcomes [31]. All these approaches have the potential to integrate knowledge across the natural and social sciences, and to do so in a new way; that is, a framework to overcome ontological differences between the social and natural sciences, and thereby also overcome ontological barriers in sustainability research [24,32].…”
Section: The Agenda 2030 As Planning and Action Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under this action prism, the new environmental strategic planning (ESP) models require citizen participation and leadership as instruments of change and improvement. Some examples of successful case studies that have become reference models are the following: the ESP model to address issues related to the management of closed coastal seas [24][25][26]; effectiveness of ESP in Thailand to achieve the legitimacy of the processes [27]; ESP and the use of indicators in water resources planning [28]; integrated models that develop coherent and policy relevant socio-ecological strategies, which are relevant to policies where appropriate decision frameworks need to be co-developed across the range of stakeholders and decision-makers in Coastal Bangladesh [29]; integrated sustainability models in management organizations [30]; identify key governance challenges that cultivating collective action, accountability, decision spaces for stakeholder interaction regarding decision-making, investment, action, and outcomes [31]. All these approaches have the potential to integrate knowledge across the natural and social sciences, and to do so in a new way; that is, a framework to overcome ontological differences between the social and natural sciences, and thereby also overcome ontological barriers in sustainability research [24,32].…”
Section: The Agenda 2030 As Planning and Action Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By integrating quantitative data and qualitative insights, the methodologies to create composite indicators on risk spans from the Seismic Risk Index (SRI) [23,24] or the Earthquake Risk Evaluation Index (EREI) developed by Rojas et al (2011) [25], to earthquakeresponsive administration [26,27]. These approaches exemplify the application of composite indicators in capturing the complex interplay of seismic hazards and societal vulnerabilities [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in this study, the transport time was selected as a validation criterion of the EMS park site. Remote sensing (RS), Global Positioning System (GPS) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS), collectively called “3S system”, are important tools in this field 34 . Li et al (2020) 35 proposed the nearest neighbor method in combination with GIS, considered road networks and census data, and evaluated the service extent of refugee parks in Changchun.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%