2014
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spatial structure of resting state connectivity stability on the scale of minutes

Abstract: Resting state functional MRI (rsfMRI) connectivity patterns are not temporally stable, but fluctuate in time at scales shorter than most common rest scan durations (5–10 min). Consequently, connectivity patterns for two different portions of the same scan can differ drastically. To better characterize this temporal variability and understand how it is spatially distributed across the brain, we scanned subjects continuously for 60 min, at a temporal resolution of 1 s, while they rested inside the scanner. We th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
87
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
7
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, interhemispheric functional interactions between different communities are highly variable over the course of a resting-state scan. Meanwhile, interhemispheric connections within the same community, especially homotopic connections, are temporally stable (12)(13)(14). Together, these findings suggest that interhemispheric coordination may occur predominantly via homotopic functional connections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For instance, interhemispheric functional interactions between different communities are highly variable over the course of a resting-state scan. Meanwhile, interhemispheric connections within the same community, especially homotopic connections, are temporally stable (12)(13)(14). Together, these findings suggest that interhemispheric coordination may occur predominantly via homotopic functional connections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Furthermore, the results shown in Fig. 6b suggest that the level of the fluctuations is strongly influenced by the underlying anatomy, possibly explaining why the most stable functional connections are observed between symmetric inter-hemispheric ROIs, expected to be more densely connected, whereas the most variable connections are found between non-symmetric inter-hemispheric regions (Gonzalez-Castillo et al 2014).…”
Section: Structure Guides Transitions Between Functional Brain Statesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Using a dynamical framework, various studies have further shown that dynamical FC (dFC) can be seen as the transition between several FC patterns (Gao et al 2010;Deco et al 2013a;Yang et al 2014) presenting varying network properties (Lv et al 2013;Sidlauskaite et al 2014;Gollo and Breakspear 2014;Shen et al 2015). The level of variation, or flexibility of dFC between specific cerebral regions has also been studied (Bassett et al 2011;Allen et al 2012;Gonzalez-Castillo et al 2014), as well as the role of anatomy in these fluctuations (Gollo et al 2015) in the macaque cortex. Finally, many groups have explored daydreaming, or mind wandering using functional imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, FC dynamics exhibit rich spatiotemporal structure. Connections between higher order cognitive regions are more variable than those between primary sensorymotor regions (13)(14)(15), and a limited set of whole-brain, quasistable FC configurations-known as FC states-reliably recur both within and across subjects at rest (13,16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%