2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spatial-temporal hierarchy of regional inequality of China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
156
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
156
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst rural income levels have improved in many regions, especially those close to large urban centres, urban-rural inequalities in income and uncoordinated urban-rural development have increased in more developed regions (Liu, 2009;Long et al, 2011). Indeed, there are significant spatial variations in the experience and impact of economic transition in China, both between urban and rural regions, and within rural regions (Li and Wei, 2010;Liu, 2009;Wan et al, 2007;Wang and Li, 2008;Wei, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst rural income levels have improved in many regions, especially those close to large urban centres, urban-rural inequalities in income and uncoordinated urban-rural development have increased in more developed regions (Liu, 2009;Long et al, 2011). Indeed, there are significant spatial variations in the experience and impact of economic transition in China, both between urban and rural regions, and within rural regions (Li and Wei, 2010;Liu, 2009;Wan et al, 2007;Wang and Li, 2008;Wei, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that the mean values of the spatial field evidenced a drop from eastern coastal China to central China, and then to western China in both 2000 and 2012. These results correlate with the overall level of economic development in those three areas, with respect to which the eastern region is still far ahead of the central and western regions [22]. Note: • Coefficient is defined as the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean, which is a statistical index commonly employed in measuring regional inequality.…”
Section: Inequality In China At Three Geographical Scalesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In addition, the largest three urban agglomerations in China-the Yangtze River Delta, the Pearl River Delta, and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei-are also located in the eastern region, which is constructive in stimulating high-speed socioeconomic growth in the region, but which also poses significant threats in terms of increasing disparity. A number of scholars argue that the distribution of municipalities, urban agglomerations, provincial capital cities, and special resource cities have a fundamental influence on the overall regional inequality of China [22,48].…”
Section: Intra-regional Inequality In the Three Regions Studiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies report that trade openness has played an important role in regional inequality (Jian, Sachs, and Warner 1996;Xu and Zou 2000;Fujita and Hu 2001;Zhang and Zhang 2003;Fu 2004;Kanbur and Zhang 2005;Fu 2007;Wan, Lu, and Chen 2007;Wan 2008;Gries and Redlin 2009;Pradhan 2009;Cai, Chen, and Zhou 2010;Wei 2010;Ezcurra and Rodríguez-Pose 2013;Mah 2016). Besides, FDI is found to be positively correlated with regional inequality (Sun and Chai 1998;Fujita and Hu 2001;Sun and Parikh 2001;Ng and Leung 2002;Zhang and Zhang 2003;Fu 2004;Nissanke and Thorbecke 2006;Ran, Voon, and Li 2007;Tsui 2007;Wan 2007;Wan, Lu, and Chen 2007;Wan 2008;Wei, Yao, and Liu 2009;Li and Wei 2010;Tian et al 2011). Wan, Lu, and Chen (2007) suggest that globalization is the most important determinant of regional inequality; however, a few studies argue that globalization exerts no, little, or even negative effect on inequality (Wei and Wu 2001;Cai, Chen, and Zhou 2010;Chen and Groenewold 2010;Yu et al 2011;Mah 2016).…”
Section: Globalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%