2015
DOI: 10.1002/2014jc010412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spatial‐temporal variability of air‐sea momentum fluxes observed at a tidal inlet

Abstract: Coastal waters are an aerodynamically unique environment that has been little explored from an air-sea interaction point of view. Consequently, most studies must assume that open ocean-derived parameterizations of the air-sea momentum flux are representative of the nearshore wind forcing. Observations made at the New River Inlet in North Carolina, during the Riverine and Estuarine Transport experiment (RIVET), were used to evaluate the suitability of wind speed-dependent, wind stress parameterizations in coast… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Eskasoni Reserve is adjacent to the Bras d'Or Lake, the local topography and bathymetry is different near the reserve and in Whycocomagh Bay. Thus, it is likely that the wind speed and momentum stress at the airwater interface differs at Whycocomagh Bay compared to Eskasoni Reserve (Ortiz-Suslow et al, 2015).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Eskasoni Reserve is adjacent to the Bras d'Or Lake, the local topography and bathymetry is different near the reserve and in Whycocomagh Bay. Thus, it is likely that the wind speed and momentum stress at the airwater interface differs at Whycocomagh Bay compared to Eskasoni Reserve (Ortiz-Suslow et al, 2015).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous measurements for four weeks in May-June 2016 were divided into 15-min blocks for analysis. The analysis for computing momentum fluxes and procedures for quality controlling the data is given in Aubinet et al (2012), which is similar to that described by Shabani et al (2014) and Ortiz-Suslow et al (2015).…”
Section: Field Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, intervals between 15 and 30 minutes are used in deep water conditions, where spatial homogeneity can be assumed over the sampling interval. A five-minute window was chosen for this study [11] due to the combination of the spatial heterogeneity of the wave and wind stress field observed at MCR and the area covered by the vessel (∼  m per interval). It is expected that the short surface waves respond most directly to the smaller-scale eddies in the atmospheric boundary layer, which are fully resolved over this time frame.…”
Section: Wind Stress: Eddy Covariancementioning
confidence: 99%