1969
DOI: 10.1007/bf02051360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The species of Hamaspora

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both H. rubi-sieboldii and H. rubi-alceifolii exhibit similar teliospore morphology with consistent solid apex size. However, the difference between H. rubi-alceifolii and H. rubi-sieboldii is that the former has more cells (5–6 vs. 4) and smaller solid apex (116–230 × 10–20 µm vs. 118–240 × 15–23 µm) [ 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both H. rubi-sieboldii and H. rubi-alceifolii exhibit similar teliospore morphology with consistent solid apex size. However, the difference between H. rubi-alceifolii and H. rubi-sieboldii is that the former has more cells (5–6 vs. 4) and smaller solid apex (116–230 × 10–20 µm vs. 118–240 × 15–23 µm) [ 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2), however, showed that a cell basal to linearly arranged cells in telia was narrower than, and firmly attached to, upper cells. This basal cell is morphologically comparable to the teliospore pedicel of Hamaspora (Monoson 1969;Cummins andHiratsuka 2003) or Fromeëlla (McCain andHennen 1990;Cummins and Hiratsuka 2003). Therefore, the generic definitions of Kuehneola and Phragmidiella by Cummins and Hiratsuka (2003) is followed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%