1956
DOI: 10.1007/bf02157171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The specification of asymmetric configuration in organic chemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
166
1
14

Year Published

1966
1966
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 796 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
166
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of Hamilton's generalized R factor method (Hamilton, 1965) to test the validity of the configurational assignments shows that the probability of the S configuration being the correct one is considerably smaller than 0.001%, so that the configuration around the sulfur atom is R in the notation of Cahn, Ingold & Prelog (1956). This is in agreement with the absolute configuration assigned by Axelrod et al (1968).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The application of Hamilton's generalized R factor method (Hamilton, 1965) to test the validity of the configurational assignments shows that the probability of the S configuration being the correct one is considerably smaller than 0.001%, so that the configuration around the sulfur atom is R in the notation of Cahn, Ingold & Prelog (1956). This is in agreement with the absolute configuration assigned by Axelrod et al (1968).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…tion at carbon I-C2 and /^-configuration at carbon II-C2, according to the nomenclature of CahnIngold-Prelog [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allen, Rowland, Fortier & Glasgow, 1990). In particular, we wish to answer three questions: (i) can we classify the hexopyranose structures using only the information available in the CSD [this information does not, at present, include codified stereochemical descriptors, for example the R,S descriptions of Cahn, Ingold & Prelog (1956)], (ii) can we gain insight from the classification, and (iii) can we predict any missing classes. In assessing the success of any automated methodology, we must begin by using well known examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%