2004
DOI: 10.1002/pad.329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The specificity of public service reform

Abstract: Despite universal recognition of the decline of public services and the need for reforms, considerable divergence of views exists on the strategy and sequencing of reform for individual countries according to their capacities and level of development. This article reflects on the general contours of public service reform, emphasising past experience, the need to be pragmatic rather than idealistic, the mudding of the waters by the New Public Management movement, the complications of structural adjustment progr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such reforms tend to compel recipient developing nations to produce target bound 'so called' good practice cases. What would appear to be the reality with regards to civil service reform in the context of the Ghanaian experience recounted in the previous section, and what has been found by Caiden and Sundaram (2004) in a recent study of administrative reform in India, suggests the need to recognise that:…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such reforms tend to compel recipient developing nations to produce target bound 'so called' good practice cases. What would appear to be the reality with regards to civil service reform in the context of the Ghanaian experience recounted in the previous section, and what has been found by Caiden and Sundaram (2004) in a recent study of administrative reform in India, suggests the need to recognise that:…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The approach has encompassed techniques and approaches, some old, some new such as job rotation, job enrichment, total quality management, project teams, strategic planning, performance budgeting and re-engineering, familiar in international businesses, but quite rare in large public bureaucracies (Golembiewski et al, 2002;Caiden and Sundaram, 2004). From these, public service reformers have selected and implemented approved programmes with more success in the developed than in the less developed economies (Polidano and Hulme, 1999).…”
Section: Issues Of Common Concern To Public Service Reformersmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four sets of activities were earmarked: Activities supporting the political engagement for an orderly transition of government, and the civil service as it prepared for a transition of government. This was based on the finding that reforms in the public sector are usually successful when they receive the support of both politicians and bureaucrats (Reschenthaler and Thompson ; Gruening ; Caiden and Sundaram ; Keen et al ; Antwi et al ). Activities supporting capacity to apply executive decision‐making, including implementation of the Cabinet Memorandum Manual with appropriate training and coaching. Activities supporting application of the management information system, and the capacity to test and refine the cabinet decision tracking system in the Office of the President. Activities promoting gender equality in the decision‐making system, supporting the application of gender impact analysis and the use of the gender assessment tool in the Cabinet Memorandum Manual. …”
Section: Description Of the Ghana Central Governance Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, international development researchers generally agree that improving governance capacity is a viable route to economic growth and political stability, particularly for the world’s poorest countries (Collier 2007). However, because good governance involves a number of complex and interrelated structures and systems, including civil service (Caiden and Sundaram 2004; Klingner 2006), they are not always sure what specific actions, particularly civil service reforms, will actually be effective in any given case.…”
Section: Why Is Civil Service Still Important?mentioning
confidence: 99%