2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.newast.2009.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spectroscopic orbits of three double-lined eclipsing binaries: I. BG Ind, IM Mon, RS Sgr

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). 3 The same conclusion follows from the velocities measured by Bakış et al (2010), which also nicely phase with ephemeris (1), showing, however, a much larger scatter (the rms residual from our fit to their data is 4.6 km s −1 , only slightly larger than 4.4 km s −1 found in the original paper).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1). 3 The same conclusion follows from the velocities measured by Bakış et al (2010), which also nicely phase with ephemeris (1), showing, however, a much larger scatter (the rms residual from our fit to their data is 4.6 km s −1 , only slightly larger than 4.4 km s −1 found in the original paper).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The value found by VHM (39.8 ± 4 km s −1 ) was based on two measurements only, and its error was likely underestimated. 59.4 ± 5 km s −1 of Bakış et al (2010) is rather large for an F-type star in the Sun's vicinity. The origin of such a large discrepancy with all remaining estimates is difficult to explain -we may only note that they did not observe any radial velocity standards, and it is conceivable that they reversed the sign of the heliocentric correction while reducing the data.…”
Section: Discussion a N D C O N C L U S I O N Smentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Out of the 7 class-II systems published in the SB9 catalogue, 5 were identified or suspected to have a shortperiod binary secondary (HIP 20935, 61880, 76031, 81023, 93995, see Johnson & Mayor 1986;Latham et al 2002;Jancart et al 2005;Griffin 2013), confirming our approach. One system is reported to have an equal-mass short-period binary as its primary star (HIP 108478, see Bakış et al 2010). We have found no reports of statistically significant evidence for higher multiplicity for the remaining system (HIP 62124, Griffin 2001).…”
Section: Comparison With the Sb9 Cataloguementioning
confidence: 57%
“…First, they found that the more massive and larger star has the lower temperature 1 , thereby indicating clearly that this component has already evolved away from the main sequence and is moving toward the subgiant regime. Second, they made attempts to resolve some problems with both the photometric phasing (already first noted in van Hamme & Manfroid 1988) and discrepancies in the systemic γ velocities obtained in the solutions of the RV curves measured during three highly different epochs by Andersen et al (1984); Bakış et al (2010); Rozyczka et al (2011). However, they were not able arrive at any definitive conclusions regarding these inconsistencies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%