2014
DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0b013e31827c6343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Spectrum of Grossly Visible Pigmented Lesions in the Uterine Cervix

Abstract: Pigmented lesions of the uterine cervix (UC) have not been systematically studied in the literature. Over an 18-mo period, we prospectively investigated the histologic spectrum of all macroscopically visible pigmented lesions of the UC. The incidence of pigmented UC was 1.6% (33/2118). Histologic examination revealed 32 cases (97%) with a histologic correlate, of which 26 lesions were of melanocytic nature including 25 blue nevi (BNs) (81%) and 1 melanotic macule (3%). The nonmelanocytic lesions included 1 cas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, however, the immunohistochemical features described in latest edi- tion of a gynecopathology textbook were different from our findings and previous reports; that is, this textbook stated that endocervical blue nevi are usually negative for HMB45 and MART-1 [10]. Certainly, two reports described that endocervical blue nevi were negative for HMB45 [8,9], but no report has stated MART-1 negative. We could not find the reason why the textbook explained that MART-1 was usually negative.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, however, the immunohistochemical features described in latest edi- tion of a gynecopathology textbook were different from our findings and previous reports; that is, this textbook stated that endocervical blue nevi are usually negative for HMB45 and MART-1 [10]. Certainly, two reports described that endocervical blue nevi were negative for HMB45 [8,9], but no report has stated MART-1 negative. We could not find the reason why the textbook explained that MART-1 was usually negative.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Histological findings were completely the same as previously reported, but immunohistochemical findings were in partial disagreement with those described in some previous publications [8,9,10]. We discuss possible reasons for this discordance.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Nonmelanotic causes include vascular lesions, vasculitis, hemorrhagic cysts, and stromal hemosiderin-laden macrophages. 2 Studies focusing on the prevalence, histologic patterns, and significance of hemosiderin pigments in the stroma of uterine cervix are relatively scarce. 3,4 We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the prevalence of this phenomenon in cervical specimens and to highlight the practical diagnostic utility and clinical and pathologic importance, if any, of cervical stromal hemosiderin pigments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%