2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3106-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The spillover effect of midwife attrition from the Nigerian midwives service scheme

Abstract: BackgroundThe Nigerian Midwives Service Scheme (MSS) increased use of antenatal services at rural public sector clinics. However, it is unclear if women who would not have otherwise sought care, or those who would have sought care in rural private sector clinics caused this change. Additionally, it is also unclear if the reported midwife attrition was associated with a spillover of the scheme’s effect on urban areas. We sought to answer these two questions using data from two nationally representative surveys.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Three countries are categorised as having highest fragility, two as very high fragility, two as high fragility and three as fragile settings. These countries included Afghanistan, [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] Bangladesh, [44][45][46][47][48] Nigeria, [49][50][51][52] Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), 53 54 South Sudan and Sudan, 55 56 Ethiopia, Pakistan, Uganda and Liberia. Afghanistan (n=7), Bangladesh (n=5), Nigeria (n=4), DRC (n=2) made up most of the studies (table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Three countries are categorised as having highest fragility, two as very high fragility, two as high fragility and three as fragile settings. These countries included Afghanistan, [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] Bangladesh, [44][45][46][47][48] Nigeria, [49][50][51][52] Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), 53 54 South Sudan and Sudan, 55 56 Ethiopia, Pakistan, Uganda and Liberia. Afghanistan (n=7), Bangladesh (n=5), Nigeria (n=4), DRC (n=2) made up most of the studies (table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%