2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2107.02810
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Spin and Orientation of the Black Hole in XTE J1908$+$094

Paul A. Draghis,
Jon M. Miller,
Abderahmen Zoghbi
et al.

Abstract: NuSTAR observed the black hole candidate XTE J1908+094 during its 2013 and 2019 outbursts. We use relativistic reflection to measure the spin of the black hole through 19 different assumptions of relxill flavors and parameter combinations. The most favored model in terms of Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) measures the spin of the black hole to be a = 0.55 +0.29 −0.45 , and an inclination of θ = 27 +2 −3 degrees (1σ statistical errors). We look at the effects of coronal geometry assumptions and density o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also been postulated that it is not the inner disc, but rather the characteristic scale height of the corona, that instead varies with accretion rate [109]. The line strength depends upon the disc inclination angle, and there remain disagreements between the inferred inner disc inclination (as measured in X-rays) vs. the binary orbital plane (as inferred in the optical) [110,111]. This may point to warped inner disc geometries, which would then need to be accounted for self-consistently when inferring 𝑎 [112].…”
Section: Spectrally Resolving the Inner Accretion Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been postulated that it is not the inner disc, but rather the characteristic scale height of the corona, that instead varies with accretion rate [109]. The line strength depends upon the disc inclination angle, and there remain disagreements between the inferred inner disc inclination (as measured in X-rays) vs. the binary orbital plane (as inferred in the optical) [110,111]. This may point to warped inner disc geometries, which would then need to be accounted for self-consistently when inferring 𝑎 [112].…”
Section: Spectrally Resolving the Inner Accretion Regimementioning
confidence: 99%